Hello Debra,
In our limited experience (3 510ks in the last 4 years) in the process for IVD clearance, FDA's main concern was 3 different locations. They never pressed for them to be 3 "geographically" diverse locations. We submitted using "reference laboratory" testing, "clinical laboratory" testing and internal testing. We too work with disease of relatively low prevalence and were able to gain clearance on one particular IVD with a total of 50 positives, instead of 50 positives at each site. We had to have multiple discussions to explain why it was not possible to get more and they eventually accepted our total numbers.
Best of luck!
------------------------------
Joy Pelfrey
Director of RA/QA
Norman OK
United States
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 09-03-2015 12:30
From: Debra Hutson
Subject: IVD Clinical Study - "geographically diverse locations"
FDA requires specimen collection from three "geographically diverse locations" for clinical studies for IVD medical devices. FDA also requests that the collection yield at least 50 positive samples to be measured at each test site. Channeling specimen collection from geographically diverse collection sites can be quite a challenge to accomplish the positive specimen requirement. For some analytes, balancing the two, geographic diversity with a decent prevalence can be quite hard where the prevalence is more regional. Does anyone have a definition of that term ("geographically diverse locations") or any practical experience (yours or someone you know :-) ) where enough geographical diversity was NOT included that you could share? Would appreciate any insight.
------------------------------
Debra Hutson
QA/RA ELITechGroup Inc
ELITechGroup
Bothell WA
United States
------------------------------