Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

  • 1.  Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 13-May-2019 11:02
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Hello everyone,

    Can anyone tell me when Class I surgical instruments will no longer be self certify and will require NB review and CE Mark under EU MDR?
    2025 or May 2020?

    thanks a million


  • 2.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 13-May-2019 12:05

    Be careful about saying Class Ir. There are only four classes, I, IIa, IIb, and III. When you follow the classification rules in Annex VIII, the conclusion will be only one of the classes.

    In additional to classes, devices can have attributes such as a reusable surgical instrument. Often the attributes create additional requirements.

    Article 52(7), says, "If [Class I] devices are placed on the market in sterile condition, have a measuring function, or are reusable surgical instruments, the manufacturer shall apply the procedures set out in Chapters I and III of Annex IX, or in Part A of Annex XI." These annexes require an application to a Notified Body, NB. See, for example, Annex IX(2.1).

    Article 52(7)(c) limits the NBs involvement for reusable surgical instruments to, "to the aspects relating to the reuse of the device, in particular cleaning, disinfection, sterilization, maintenance, and functional testing and the related instructions for use".

    Because you don't have an NB certificate under the MDD, you cannot apply the Article 120 soft transition.

    The conclusion is that you need an EU-MDR NB certificate to place these devices on the market after May 26, 2020. This is the date of application from Article 123(2).



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 13-May-2019 12:23
    I should add that you don't have to wait until May 26, 2020. When you get the NB certificate you can put the EU-MDR CE Mark on the product.

    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 15-May-2019 13:32
    Hello Dan

    I'm very glad that you brought this up again because I still feel like I am getting conflicting interpretations regarding the MDR transition (or lack thereof) for reusable class I devices.

    I understand that there are no NB certificates for reusable class I devices under MDD, but if these devices have already been "lawfully placed on the market pursuant to Directives 90/385/EEC ... prior to 26 May 2020" (i.e., in accordance with MDD Annex VII), then it would seem that MDR transitional provision number 4 applies and would allow them to be continued to be made available on the market until May 27, 2025.  

    Then, I've heard interpretations that MDR transitional provision number 4 would only apply to reusable class I devices that are already physically in the EU and no longer in company control (e.g., the company has already shipped them to an EU customer) prior to May 26, 2020.  But based on the definition of "placing on the market" meaning "the first making available of a device ... on the Union market",  it would seem that as long as the first supply (aka shipment) to an EU customer is prior to May 26, 2020, then the device could continue to be made available on the market regardless of whether the shipments are made after May 26, 2020.  

    It makes sense that a brand new (or significantly changed) reusable class I device would require MDR certification after May 26, 2020, but I'm still confused as to why reusable class I devices already CE marked in accordance with MDD Annex VII wouldn't be able to continue to be supplied until May 2025 based on MDR transitional provision number 4 and the EU definition of "placing on the market". 

    Where am I (and others) misunderstanding?  Thanks tons for your help unraveling the issue!

    Best Regards,  Lauren

    ------------------------------
    Lauren Kamer RAC
    Director of Regulatory
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 16-May-2019 05:19
    Hi,

    Thanks for your question Lauren.
    That also is my current understanding.
    Article 120 (4) states that "devices that are lawfully placed on the market pursuant to Directives [...] 93/42/EEC [...] may continue to be made available [...] until 27 May 2025."

    So as long as these devices were put into service according to MDD it is fine to continue selling them. It would also include any devices that receive a different classification according to MDR as long as they comply with MDD / AIMDD. This article does not refer to any additional requirements.
    This is how i understand this article.

    I take it your interpretation includes the expectation that these devices must also comply with additional classification rules and requirements according to MDR.
    Though this is not defined in the "soft-transition article".

    Could you clarify if there are additional requirements you use for this interpretation?

    Thanks
    Sven

    ------------------------------
    Sven Schaumann
    Dipl.-Ing.
    Potsdam
    Germany
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 16-May-2019 09:17
    Hello Sven

    Thank you very much for your reply. 

    My interpretation of Article 120 (4) is that the reusable class I devices lawfully placed onto the market in the EU (not necessarily yet put into service) for the first time before May 26, 2020, in accordance with MDD Annex VII, can continue to be made available (e.g., can continue to be shipped to customers in the EU from our company outside the EU) or put into service until May 27, 2025. 

    But I do believe that as of May 26, 2020, that they will need to comply with MDR requirements related to post-market surveillance, etc. as stated in Article 120 (3), even though not explicitly stated in Article 120 (4).

    I am hearing certainly interpretations to the contrary, so I am interested to understand why my interpretation may not be correct.  

    Thank you again and Best Regards,  Lauren


    ------------------------------
    Lauren Kamer RAC
    Director of Regulatory
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 16-May-2019 14:26
    There a number of things here, so let me take them one at a time.

    The issue is not Class I reusable devices, but Class I reusable surgical instruments. For example, an oral digital thermometer is a Class I device by Annex VIII, Rule 5 paragraph 1, indent 1. However, the thermometer is reusable. It is not a reusable surgical instrument as defined in Annex VIII(2.3).

    You also mention that Article 120(4) says May 27, 2025. I believe it is a typo and should have said May 26, 2024. However, this does not change the approach.

    Consider Article 5(1), which says that devices must meet the MDR. This is the source of the common statement "No grandfathering". The intent is that nothing under the MDD or AIMD counts toward the MDR.

    Article 120(4) is an OR statement.

    If the device is legally placed on the market under the MDD before May 26, 2020, then it can continue to be made available or put into service. This means that the manufacturer doesn't have to "pull back" an MDD device even though it doesn't meet the MDR. (For example, it has an MDD CE Mark, not an MDR CE Mark.)

    If the device is legally placed on the market under an Article 120(2) certificate from May 26, 2020, then it can continue to be made available or put into service. As in the case above, the device has an MDD certificate and so an MDD CE Mark. The manufacturer doesn't have to "pull it back".

    Article 120(2) MDD certificates fall into three categories.
    Issued prior to May 25, 2017 and not under Annex IV remain valid until the certificate's expiration date.
    Issued prior to May 25, 2017 under Annex IV remain valid until the earlier of the certificate's expiration date or May 27, 2022.
    Issued from May 25, 2017 remain valid until the earlier of the certificate's expiration date or May 27, 2024.


    Article 120(3) adds additional conditions for a device with an MDD Article 120(2) certificate after the MDR date of application.

    Now, apply the chain of reasoning to a Class I reusable surgical instrument. It cannot have an Article 120(2) MDD certificate because the MDD has no such provision. An MDD NB cannot issue such a certificate.

    Consequently, the Class I reusable surgical instrument manufacturer cannot use the Article 120 soft transition.

    I recommend that these manufacturers notify their customer of a potential shortage and allow the customers to build inventory until the manufacturer can apply an MDR CE Mark.



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 17-May-2019 12:01
    Hi Dan

    Thank you for your explanation.  It is not comprehensible to me why the EC didn't allow a transition for Class I reusable instruments already on the EU market, but it is what it is.

    Thank you again and Best Regards,  Lauren

    ------------------------------
    Lauren Kamer RAC
    Director of Regulatory
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 18-May-2019 09:36

    The answer to the transition question is easy. Nobody expected to need it. The plan was that the EU would set up all the machinery in time to designate notified bodies. In parallel, manufacturers would be working on the implementation. It would all come together by May 26, 2020. The back-up plan in Article 120 would be unnecessary.

    Things could still work out. Manufacturers of Class I reusable surgical instruments should have all the work completed for full compliance to the MDR. When the manufacturer's NB is designated they could do the audit, issue the MDR certificates, and there would be no disruption.

    I think this is an unintended consequence of the need for the Article 120 transition.

     



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 18-May-2019 17:05

    It occurred to me that, in my optimistic scenario, that is (at least) one more problem.

    A prospective EU-MDR NB must declare that areas that define the type of medical devices for which the NB seeks designation. The list is in the EU documents related to NB application.

    The manufacturer of a Class I reusable surgical needs to verify that the prospective EU-MDR NB will have the appropriate scope. If not, then the manufacturer needs to identify a different prospective NB.



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 24-May-2019 04:16
    "You also mention that Article 120(4) says May 27, 2025. I believe it is a typo and should have said May 26, 2024. However, this does not change the approach."

    Hi Dan,

    I wanted to be sure about this part.

    So I just double checked this information in two languages (EN / DE) - as you might know there are sometimes some translation errors.
    Still Article 120(4) says "..27 May 2025".

    Could you clarify why you are referring to 26 May 2024 ?
    Are you applying another MDR rule here?

    Thanks
    Sven

    ------------------------------
    Sven Schaumann
    Dipl.-Ing. Electrical Engineering
    Freelance Consultant
    https://www.med-engineering.de
    Potsdam, Germany
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 24-May-2019 09:05

    The Article 120 soft transition depends on a valid NB certificate for the device. Article 120(2) second paragraph says that all of these certificates become void on May 27, 2024. Article 120(4) currently says that the soft transition devices may be made available on the market or put into service until May 27, 2025. This is at least one year after the certificate is void. There is an inconsistency here, so I infer that 2025 is a typo and should have been 2024.

     

    This inferred typo would not have changed in the various translations. I expect the next correction document will fix it.



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 25-May-2019 11:38
    Hello all,

    Article 120.4 talks about devices placed on the market before 26 May 2020, not about first placed on the market. It therefore means that products that were sold into the distribution chain before 26 May 2020 can continue to be sold on to the final user (being made available). So it is allow to sell the stuff in the distributors warehouses. Selling stock clause.....
    You cannot continue to produce products after 26 May 2020 and then sell them to EU, unless under an MDD  certificate (until that runs out). Then you move into the selling stock clause.
    You can continue to use this sell out of stock clause, even in parallel to selling new products under MDR CE marking.

    kind regards

    Gert

    ------------------------------
    Gert Bos FRAPS, PhD
    CTO, Executive Director & Partner at Qserve Group
    Baarn
    Netherlands
    Gert.bos@qservegroup.com
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: Class Ir (previously Self Certify)

    Posted 26-May-2019 12:16

    Dear All,

    thank you for the interesting discussion.  There is a misunderstanding of the European regulatory systems and that is not a surprise for companies working under a different regulatory system like the FDA.  We cover this in our workshops and in house workshops MDSS offers (https://mdssar.com/education-training/). 

    Please read the definition of the „placing on the market" and "making available on the market" under Article 2:

    (27) 'making available on the market' means any supply of a device, other than an investigational device, for distribution, consumption or use on the Union market in the course of a commercial activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge;

    (28) 'placing on the market' means the first making available of a device, other than an investigational device, on the Union market;

    This refers to a particular device.  Meaning a device A1 is being placed on market today it can be made further available by the distributor. And this particular device A1 is being FIRST made available with that action!

    A second device (exactly of the same type) is now device A2. Also, device A2 is being placed on the market as well.  This device experiences as well to be FIRST made available.

    Having understood that concept then it becomes clear that there is no "Grandfathering" concept in Europe.  In general, each device must comply with the requirement at the time it is being placed on the market. This is emphasized in Article 10 (9) a device must be reviewed when changes in harmonized standards etc. occur. The next product (e.g. A3) then must comply to the new standards etc. (See also MDR article 10 (9)).  We all know that with the EN IEC 60601 updates or any of the other standards.   

    With keeping that in mind Article 120 (4) becomes clear! It only clarifies when the making available on the market for the distributor stopsl.  Basically, it means all device which have been legally placed on the market under the MDD (for risk class I before May 2020 and the additional transition for devices with a MDD certificate until that Cert expires or at the latest until 2024) can be MADE AVAIALBLE until 2025. There is no typo! It also means that your distributor will check his inventory and may not like what he sees already in 2023 because he then can only make those devices available (meaning he can only sell them) until 2025 with the MDD certificate. 



    ------------------------------
    Ludger Moeller
    President
    MDSS GmbH
    lmoeller@mdss.com
    ------------------------------