Hello Beni,
It is a very limited information for us to be able to advise you but at the same time I understand that you cannot disclose due to confidentiality.
I have worked on many oncology studies and can share some experience from them that may be useful to you as an idea. I had a few studies through the years that did not meet the primary end point of progression free survival but patients had an extended overall survival so while the study 'failed' it actually showed long term benefit for the patients. In such case the company may decide to further look into long term survival data and potentially design another study. However, all this depends on the company and what their plans are. I had a very interesting case from few years ago where the study did not meet the primary end point but 5 years later when we were closing the study the patients were cancer free. I think it was an amazing result for the patients and yet the company decided to stop the development of the drug.
In short, it is a complex decision which depends on the drug, patient population and what the company can afford to do at this moment.
Good luck with your study.
Olga
------------------------------
Olga Peycheva
Regulatory and Study Start Up Specialist (Clinical trials)
Solutions OP Ltd
https://solutionsop.co.uk/United Kingdom
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 15-Nov-2023 14:42
From: Bani Tchekanova
Subject: Phase III study questions
Team,
In a hypothetical situation where the phase III interim results are not showing better than standard efficacy, what options are there?
------------------------------
Bani Tchekanova
Escondido CA
United States
------------------------------