Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Regulatory KPIs

    Posted 13-Mar-2017 13:28
    Does anyone have any thoughts on KPIs that could be used in a small company's RA dept? From what I have seen and researched, regulatory KPIs center on # of filings/approvals per year, approval times for the above, # of observations/warning letters per year, or revenue per submission. However, most of these work better for a larger company and as reported on an annual basis. Does anyone have input on KPIs that would be meaningful to measure in a small company (that has fewer products) on a monthly basis?
    Thanks!

    ------------------------------
    Hiral Dutia
    Advanced Instruments, LLC
    Norwood MA
    United States
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Regulatory KPIs

    Posted 14-Mar-2017 17:21

    Great question!  I'm just starting to develop mine and am focusing on the value to the business in terms of resource manhours, internal & external submission costs, submission timeline, and # holds/questions received.  However, I get most feedback around the regulatory intelligence I added to beef up my monthly report.  New recognized standards, guidance documents, competitor clearances/recalls/MDRs seem to pique the interest of the SLT more than the boring stats.  However, I expect that the stats will definitely become more meaningful as we grow and globalize. 

    Tina



    ------------------------------
    Tina O'Brien RAC, MS
    Director of Regulatory Affairs
    Aroa Biosurgery
    Auckland
    New Zealand
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Regulatory KPIs

    Posted 14-Mar-2017 22:33
    I would consider whether the "regulatory" KPIs are treated as indicators of the performance of the company's regulatory department or the regulatory performance of the company.  If they are treated as measures of departmental performance, then I would consider what indicators reflect the performance of the department itself.  RA has almost no influence on the number of filings or revenue per submission. RA is rarely the cause of a warning letter.  And time to approval depends heavily on the quality of the information other departments provide to RA.

    ------------------------------
    Julie Omohundro, ex-RAC (US, GS), still an MBA
    Principal Consultant
    Class Three, LLC
    Durham, North Carolina, USA
    919-544-3366 (T)
    434-964-1614 (C)
    julie@class3devices.com
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Regulatory KPIs

    Posted 17-Mar-2017 11:04
    I've done this a number of times, but a lot depends on exactly what RA does in your company and your company culture. As Julie said, in some cultures, where RA doesn't have good support or "feeder" processes, metrics can be tough because they really reflect the broader organization, not RA. That said, a few ideas that may be useful.

    - change order review timeliness (note - use time to decision, not generally time to approval)
    - ad/promo review timeliness
    - % on time RA deliverables to project teams (be they regulatory plans or whatever)
    - submission completion time from receipt of last input (setting a target will be challenging as it depends on types of submissions among other thing) as you say, this one may need a longer duration than quarterly in a small organization
    - for submission quality you can think of things like
        * no refuse to files
        * days your responses pending
        * % of "repeat" questions (which would imply you didn't update processes after getting the question the first time through)
        * first pass approval/clearance

    You will have to adapt to meet the needs to your current organization and your current roles an responsibilities. If you happen to have MDRs and/or internal audit, there are plenty more you can add.

    g-

    ------------------------------
    Ginger Glaser RAC
    Vice-President, Quality and Regulatory Affairs
    Maplewood MN
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Regulatory KPIs

    Posted 20-Mar-2017 15:23
    In addition to all of the good points in the previous replies, I would include a "policy influence" type section which could include participation in AdvaMed or standards groups related to your product. With the previously mentioned items you'd end up with "Submissions" which is probably the largest chunk; Training or Upkeep which is keeping up with the new standards, guidances, and regulations as well as FDA/Notified Body workshops etc; and Policy issues. 

    Best,

    ------------------------------
    Michael Nilo
    Network Regulatory Partners
    Nilo Medical Consulting Group
    Portland OR
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Regulatory KPIs

    Posted 21-Mar-2017 12:43
    Thanks so much for everyone's input! I agree that "regulatory" KPIs are often not just influenced by RA itself, which is why coming up with a list of true regulatory KPIs was difficult.

    I think keeping up with regulatory intelligence/training, and percent of on-time RA deliverables to other teams are something I will consider as those could work for a company our size. I will incorporate some of these into our list. If anyone else has more insight, I'd be open to hearing it.

    ------------------------------
    Hiral Dutia
    Advanced Instruments, LLC
    Norwood MA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Regulatory KPIs

    Posted 21-Mar-2017 12:54
    Hiral,

    Please don't be overambitious!  Be a person who can execute starting from manageable, customized list of items (say 5 items) in a measurable manner. 

    D