Sounds like the normal isolated challenges we've all faced over the years. Doesn't mean the industry on average did the same.
Original Message:
Sent: 08-Nov-2016 13:44
From: Ginger Glaser
Subject: Class I devices for Design Controls
Hmmm, my experience has been more that some software developers were following some design controls.prior to the QSR. I have, however, over the years, seen many, many gaps in software design controls. Among the most common
- using incomplete or poorly written requirements
- using direct VoC as requirements rather than translating them
- thinking that DVal can happen "after beta launch"
- little to no thought put into design transfer "what do you mean the service guys can't install it?"
- not keeping trace matrix "history" or good design history - often in Agile software programs where it is deemed to be "busywork"
At one point I even had a software developer tell me "FDA doesn't require software validation" so there is quite the mix out there.
g-
------------------------------
Ginger Glaser RAC
Vice-President, Quality and Regulatory Affairs
Maplewood MN
United States
Original Message:
Sent: 07-Nov-2016 10:39
From: Julie Omohundro
Subject: Class I devices for Design Controls
If you are responsible for regulatory compliance, then of course this matters. Otherwise, it doesn't.
Design controls weren't invented by FDA, but by product developers. In my experience, software developers were following design controls long before CDRH ever heard of them. If a company is trying to develop a software product (standalone or otherwise) without following design controls, any regulatory requirements are the least of its worries. IMO.
------------------------------
Julie Omohundro, ex-RAC (US, GS), still an MBA
Principal Consultant
Class Three, LLC
Durham, North Carolina, USA
919-544-3366 (T)
434-964-1614 (C)
julie@class3devices.com
Original Message:
Sent: 19-Oct-2016 13:26
From: Maham Ansari
Subject: Class I devices for Design Controls
Can anyone provide any guidance on Class I medical devices requiring design controls.
This link says the following:
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=820.30
(2) The following class I devices are subject to design controls:
(i) Devices automated with computer software; and
(ii) The devices listed in the following chart.
What kind of devices fit into category (i)? This is not any device encompassing software, correct?
Any recommendations on minimal requirements for design controls for any Class I devices (across different jurisdictions) would be great. I'm curious to know what level of design controls, if any at all, other companies are applying to Class I devices.
Thank you.
------------------------------
Maham Ansari MS RAC
Synaptive Medical
Toronto ON
------------------------------