I'm a consultant (devices) and often advise my clients on this issue.
I recommend that you don't set a specific time, because you will run into regulatory issues. Instead, recognize that that closure time, regardless of you define it, has an underlying skewed statistical distribution. It will have a long tail to the right. I recommend setting a target that utilizes this distribution; say 95% of CAs should close within 30 days. This now gives you a performance measure that you can monitor and discuss at Management Review.
CAs need to be, in my opinion, on a short cycle. You need to prevent the problem from happening again by determining the cause. It is causing nonconformance material, waste of resources, and the potential for escape of a "bad" product.
PAs could have a different target, (95% within 60 days) because the problem has not happened.
(Be sure you understand the difference between CA and PA as defined in ISO 9000:2005!)
In either case, there is a psychological problem. If the CA or PA is open too long, nobody works it. Priorities change and other issues arise.
Part of your process should ensure that each open CA or PA is active. This means that somebody is actually doing work.
-------------------------------------------
Dan O'Leary
Swanzey NH
United States
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 05-17-2013 08:07
From: Donna Elliott
Subject: CAPA System
I am part of a team that is working on improving our current CAPA system. One of the things we're working on is creating a reasonable timeframe for closing CAPA's. Our thoughts are CAPA's should not be open any longer than 90 days; however, there's been some talk that CAPA's can be closed within 30 days. Can anyone share how their company approaches CAPA closures?
Thank you.
-------------------------------------------
Donna Elliott
Charlottesville VA
United States
-------------------------------------------