I'm just curious how the performance is improved with no physical design change. Must be a composition change then in the polymer? If so, then at least some mechanical and/or other accelerated stability testing should be considered to verify that the shelf life is not affected. Any thing found in accelerated should trigger a full real time study.
Is there the potential for polymer degradation like brittleness or light activated changes to occur? If this is non-sterile, the packaging integrity and validation is clearly not linked to sterility but protection. On what basis was the 3 year life set originally? That's the criteria on which your client should be basing their decision.
-------------------------------------------
Ginger Cantor RAC
Centaur Consulting LLC, Owner and Principal Consultant
River Falls WI
United States
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 5/21/2015 4:28:48 PM
From: lin.wu.md@gmail.com
Subject: Nonsterile Medical Device shelf life/stability testing
I wanted to gauge some feedback from you regarding Non-Sterile Class II Medical Device, a 510(k) product made of Polysulfone. The device in question currently has 3 year expiration date; my client is intending to improve the performance specification of the device (for the same intended uses). My question is that it is necessary for my client to re-establish the expiration date, i.e., conducting full shelf life/stability testing for the subject product, given that there is no physical design change of the product?
Look forward to your comments and feedback.
Thanks
-------------------------------------------
Lin Wu RAC
Waltham MA
United States
-------------------------------------------