Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Stability Requirements for Pre-June 2014 ANDAs

    Posted 02-Feb-2016 13:18
    Hello,

    Prior to the new ANDA stability requirement going into effect (6/20/2014), many companies filed ANDAs and some have just recently (the past few months) received Refuse-to-Receive letters.  Can one consider these letters to be inclusive of all the refusal items?  Or if you fully correct all the items in the letter and resubmit, is there a potential to receive another RtR with new objectionable items?  

    More specifically, an ANDA was filed for a topical product.  The original ANDA included the proper amount of ACC, INT and CRT stability data on the worst-case orientation.  Some guidances state you "should" include the upright as well as worst-case (horizontal, inverted,etc).  The Agency has also stated that the date of the original ANDA submission will determine the stability requirement.

    Is upright and inverted/horizontal stability required for a pre-June 2014 ANDA?  And if so, is it all 3 conditions on both orientations, or just CRT on the upright and all 3 conditions on the worst-case?  The worst-case is the long-term stability orientation.

    Any help or input from your experience would be greatly appreciated!  The guidances are vague (surprise!) and I have heard varying opinions.

    Thanks!
       Lisa


  • 2.  RE: Stability Requirements for Pre-June 2014 ANDAs

    Posted 03-Feb-2016 07:01

    Lisa,

    Prior to June 2014 stability was only required for AC and RT conditions, however, for a liquid it was also required for upright and horizontal (or inverted) orientation. The post approval stability protocol that should have been submitted would have only listed the worst case (most likely inverted). As for the RTR, yes, FDA can reject your application each time it's submitted. Keep in mind a different reviewer may review your application upon receipt for filing.

    ------------------------------
    John Lay
    Director, Regulatory and Quality
    Vistapharm Inc.
    Largo FL
    United States



  • 3.  RE: Stability Requirements for Pre-June 2014 ANDAs

    Posted 03-Feb-2016 11:00

    Yes, in my experience, upright and inverted/horizontal have always been required for all three storage conditions.

    ------------------------------
    Kathleen Dungan
    Manager, Regulatory Affairs
    Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
    Lake Zurich IL
    United States



  • 4.  RE: Stability Requirements for Pre-June 2014 ANDAs

    Posted 04-Feb-2016 03:31

    Has anyone experienced screening comments from FDA regarding a lack of upright and horizontal data for a syringe product?

    The ANDA Stability Q&A and ANDA Checklist both seem to suggest they're required. But the scientific rationale for requiring them is lost on me. The solution contacts all components of the syringe irrespective of orientation. And how does one determine whether needle up or needle down is upright for a syringe?

    Thanks,

    Duncan

    ------------------------------
    Duncan Wilson PhD (RAC US)



  • 5.  RE: Stability Requirements for Pre-June 2014 ANDAs

    Posted 04-Feb-2016 07:27

    Duncan,

    Does the product get stored in the upright condition (meaning in a holder)? How is the product sold. None the less upright and horizontal would be needed. You would present your comments explaining why only one orientation post approval is needed.

    John

    ------------------------------
    John Lay
    Director, Regulatory and Quality
    Vistapharm Inc.
    Largo FL
    United States



  • 6.  RE: Stability Requirements for Pre-June 2014 ANDAs

    Posted 05-Feb-2016 04:06

    Hi John,

    Syringes are typically stored in plastic trays within cartons. The orientation of the tray during storage is largely up to the customer.

    Prior to the ANDA Stability Guidance Q&A, and the addition to the ANDA checklist of the requirement for upright and horizontal storage we were typically only providing horizontal data for syringes in the ANDA. FDA didn't seem to have any issue with that approach.

    Since the Q&A, and update to the checklist, it seems FDA are looking for both orientations. The low risk approach would be to fall in line with the Q&A, but there's a significant resource implication to adding an additional orientation to the stability program.

    I think my bigger question is do FDA really expect both orientations for syringes and why?

    The drug product completely fills a syringe and therefore contacts all packaging materials at all times irrespective of orientation. So the additional information that will be obtained as a result of studies in multiple orientations is questionable. A scientific justification for why multiple orientations is unnecessary seems feasible, but FDA may not accept that approach.

    If FDA are looking for both orientations do they consider needle up or needle down to be vertical. Or are FDA looking for 3 orientations for syringes: horizontal, needle up and needle down.

    Best regards,

    Duncan

    ------------------------------
    Duncan Wilson PhD (RAC US)