Hi,
On a related note, CFR 801.45(e) says the following:
Exception to be noted in design history file. A labeler that decides to make use of an exception under paragraph (d of this section) must document the basis of that decision in the design history file required by 820.30(j) of this chapter.
The draft guidance on UDI (issued June 26, 2015) says the following in section III.D.4 (page 12):
Please note that there is no reason to submit a 21 CFR 801.55 request for exception from UDI direct marking requirements if any exception under 21 CFR 801.45(d) is applicable
So if an 801.45(d) exemption applies to your device, then you can handle it through internal documentation.
However, the following document does not seem to take into account Section (d) exceptions.
UDI Exceptions, Alternatives and Time Extensions
Curious what others think about whether Exceptions that fall under 801.45(d) must be submitted for approval or shall they be documented internally? Basically, the Regulation and the draft Guidance seem to be at odds with the latter document.
thanks
------------------------------
Vineet Sarin PhD
President
Kinamed Inc
Camarillo CA
United States
Original Message:
Sent: 02-15-2016 11:31
From: Jayshree Patel
Subject: UDI Exception
Hi! Has anyone successfully filed an UDI exception? Any suggestions/tips on filing an exception for UDI?
------------------------------
Jayshree Patel MS
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Waters Corporation
Milford MA
United States
------------------------------