Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  How to best define a Phase 1a vs Phase 1b

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 03-Apr-2020 17:00
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Dear Forum-
    I would appreciate your thoughts, comments, or links to other resources. Phase 1a, Phase 1b, Phase 2a, Phase 2b are commonly used in Oncology trials but, I have been unable to find a solid definition of either. While I can define a Phase 1 study and a Phase 2 and the requirements for each (including descriptive definitions in CFR) it is difficult to accurately define and identify a Phase 1a or Phase 1b.  How do you differentiate between them?  

    Thank you.


  • 2.  RE: How to best define a Phase 1a vs Phase 1b

    Posted 06-Apr-2020 08:43
    I am not aware of a formal regulatory definition, but common best practice is to describe as follows when the development program breaks down the studies in these categories:

    1a: single ascending dose in healthy subjects
    1b: multiple ascending dose in healthy subjects
    2a: dose ranging in patients
    2b: proof of concept in patients

    Clinicaltrials.gov which defines their study phases based on 21 CFR 312 does not make this distinction.

    ------------------------------
    Glen Park PharmD
    Executive Director, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance
    Jersey City NJ
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: How to best define a Phase 1a vs Phase 1b

    Posted 07-Apr-2020 16:24
    Yes, I'm with Glen. Phase 1a involves single dose escalation to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) whereas Phase 1b involves cohort expansion at multiple ascending dose levels to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose, which could differ from MTD based on various types of evaluations such as correlative studies.

    ------------------------------
    Jo Huang RAC
    Assoc Manager - Regulatory Affairs
    Irvine CA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: How to best define a Phase 1a vs Phase 1b

    Posted 16-Apr-2020 10:19
    Edited by Deep Shah 16-Apr-2020 11:06
    Hello all,
    Agreed with both Glen and Jo. However, I’ve always seen phase 1 as a single study with two parts SAD and MAD for non-oncology studies. sometimes it can be phase 1/2a, which will be three parts; SAD, MAD and dose range finding in targeted patients. There are different ways we can interpret this based on the nature of your investigational product. (i.e., I’ve worked on a molecule where phase 2 was a pivotal study due to life threatening nature of a disease we were targeting and no treatments were available)

    Hope this helps.

    Best,
    Deep Shah

    ---------------------------------
    Deep Shah
    Regulatory Affairs CMC, Biologics

    Seattle WA
    United States
    ---------------------------------