Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  IVDR and Technical Documentation sampling plan

    Posted 16-Jun-2021 15:11
    Hi all,

    As we prepare for IVDR, I have been puzzled by a requirement outlined in MDCG 2019-13 Guidance on sampling...for the assessment of the technical documentation.

    This guidance states that one each TD from every category and one each TD from every generic device group are sampled and assessed prior to issuing a QMS certificate. It also states that during the period of validity (assumed to be 5 years), at least one TD from every generic device group and at least one TD from every category will be sampled and assessed. Additionally, at least one TD must be assessed each year.

    But given that the range of devices was sampled prior to issuing the certificate, doesn't that already fulfill the requirement to have the range of devices sampled during the period of validity?

    Or do I have a reading comprehension problem and the sampling for those two events (before QMS cert issued, and during the period of validity) is different?

    Thanks for helping me understand.

    ------------------------------
    Corey Jaseph RAC
    Director of Regulatory Affairs
    Wheatland CA
    United States
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: IVDR and Technical Documentation sampling plan

    Posted 16-Jun-2021 15:12
    And a follow-up - do we assign a single IVR/IVS/IVT/IVP/IVD code per device TD, or all that may apply from each (IVR/IVS/IVT/IVP/IVD)?

    ------------------------------
    Corey Jaseph RAC
    Director of Regulatory Affairs
    Wheatland CA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: IVDR and Technical Documentation sampling plan

    Posted 16-Jun-2021 17:53

    For each device, you will identify a number of attributes. For the NBs sampling plan the important ones are device class, EMDN code, the Basic UDI-DI, IVDR code, and the IVP code. Note that footnote 6 says, "In case where more than one EMDN code applies to one device, only the most appropriate one of these EMDN codes will be assigned for sampling purposes".

    Start with the device class.
    For Class A there is no NB sampling because there is no NB involvement.
    For Class B there is NB sampling based on the categories of devices
    For Class C there is NB sampling based on generic device groups
    For Class D there is no NB sampling because the NB reviews every TD at every audit

    Typically, the NB will send you a form on which you will list all the devices for which you want the NB to provide a certificate. It will include all the attributes required for the NB to make the sampling plans.

    The NB will make multiple sampling plans – one for each device category and one for each generic group. Each sampling plan will have a range, the list of devices in the category or the group.

    Example: You have one category of devices and the range is five devices. Prior to the certificates, the NB will select one device for the sample, but they won't tell you until the last minute. You will need to have the TD available for all five devices in the category. Then during the four subsequent surveillance audits, they will pick one device at random. Since the sampling plan is a secret, you won't know which device until they tell you.

    Example: You have one category of devices and the range is two devices. Prior to issuing the certificate the NB will pick one. During the surveillance audits they will keep picking between the two. Because the range is small, the NB focuses on PMS. The NB must do at least one TD audit.

    Example: You have three categories of devices and the ranges are seven devices, ten devices, and twelve devices. The NB will set up a sampling plan for each category with the following constraints – there is at least one TD audit each audit (initial and four surveillance), each audit looks at least 15% of the TDs in the category, and over the five audits the NB looks at each TD at least one time.

    A similar situation applies to each generic device group.

    During the audits the NB will sample from each category and from each group. In addition, they will look at all Class D TDs.



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: IVDR and Technical Documentation sampling plan

    Posted 17-Jun-2021 15:02
    Hey Dan,

    Thanks so much for your informed reply; I appreciate your help and knowledge.

    I don't think I was clear on what I was asking, so I will try to restate. Also, you said something that I had interpreted differently.

    1. From reading MDCG 2019-13, I understood that 15% of the Technical Documents from each category and from each generic device group are sampled over the course of the 5 year certification cycle, not each annual audit. From the guidance - 'it is expected that 15% of devices from each category and from each generic device group covered in the certificate will be sampled during its validity, taking into account the maximum validity of 5 years.' You stated that each annual audit must look at 15%, which is not what I interpreted...

    2. Based on the guidance stating that the entire range of products' Technical Documents are assessed prior to issuing a QMS certificate, doesn't this fulfill the requirement of the entire range being sampled over the first 5 year certification cycle? Therefore, only one TD needs to be assessed at year 2, at year 3, at year 5, at year 5 (unless we haven't met the 15% requirement yet)?

    3. I interpreted the guidance to state the range of products must be covered (at least one from each category and at least one from each generic device group) over the course of the certificate validity, but the IVDR states that 'all devices covered by the certificate are sampled over the period of validity of the certificate.' Does the guidance not agree with the IVDR, or is it not as explicit? Or is the guidance interpreting 'all devices' to mean 'the entire range' of devices? Or am I just not reading the guidance correctly?

    4. Finally, I understand we assign only one EMDN code for a device with a Technical Document. Is it also just one IVR code and one IVP code? (And IVT and IVS)

    Thanks for engaging me on this. It's really helpful to my understanding.

    ------------------------------
    Corey Jaseph RAC
    Director of Regulatory Affairs
    Wheatland CA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: IVDR and Technical Documentation sampling plan

    Posted 17-Jun-2021 16:50

    Corey,

    Happy to help.

    For #1, the sentence is in section 4.1.2 Sampling during surveillance. I now think you are correct. It is at least 15% over each five-year certification cycle. I had always read it such that over the five-year cycle all TDs would have been covered.

    For #2, section 4.1.1 Sampling during surveillance applies. Both indents say that prior to issuing the certificate "at least one representative device". This is not the full range.

    For #3, the ambiguity is in the word sampled. In a different context, we may say all product lots are sampled at incoming inspection. That means that for all lots that come in the door, some pieces are examined in the sample. It is 100% of all lots, not 100% of all pieces. In this case it is 100% of all categories and groups, not 100% of all TDs. (For #1, I believed it was 100% of all TDs over the five-year cycle.)

    For #4, you could assign multiple EMDN codes. The categories and groups combine "like" things together. The NB will use only the most appropriate one. You need to steer the NB to the smallest number so the categories and groups have a large number of members.

    For the EMDN code in general, you may have multiple codes in the TD. One point, yet unanswered, is the number of EMDN codes allowed in the Eudamed device registration/UDI module. For categories, according to 3.1, they all have the same IVR codes. For groups, according to 3.2 second bullet, they all have the same EMDN code with the most appropriate IVP code.

    There is one more issue that is not clear. In 4.2.2 on selecting the sample, both bullets say, "at least one representative device covered by a Basic UDI-DI". If a group or category includes more than Basic UDI-DI, it is not clear if this means to sample from the Basic UDI-DIs as well.

    The good news is that, other assigning than assigning the codes, there is nothing for you to do. The NB will develop all of this behind the veil of secrecy and tell you which TDs are in the sample.

    There is no bad news, because every TD is in a perpetual "audit-ready" state.



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: IVDR and Technical Documentation sampling plan

    Posted 17-Jun-2021 17:21
    Thank you, Dan, I really appreciate your expertise and response.

    ------------------------------
    Corey Jaseph RAC
    Director of Regulatory Affairs
    Wheatland CA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: IVDR and Technical Documentation sampling plan

    Posted 18-Jun-2021 02:53
    Thank you for this discussion and points raised Dan on locations of the regulation where this is cited because it is a continual discussion we have with clients about what is going to be reviewed and more importantly when.  Really good information which I just wanted to comment on two things:

    1. 'The good news is that, other assigning than assigning the codes, there is nothing for you to do. The NB will develop all of this behind the veil of secrecy and tell you which TDs are in the sample.' Sadly I wish this was not the case and this whole sampling method should be more transparent by Notified Bodies.  They do not have to tell you which ones they are auditing but should at least give you a plan, i.e. 'x' in 2022, 'x' in 2023, etc.  I strongly believe the Commission and Member States should develop better guidance on this aspect, meaning if you have 10 Technical Documentation files, then over 5 years certification cycle, there would be 1 reviewed every third year (the so-called 15% of total) or there would be at least 1 reviewed every year (so-called 15% from each year).

    2. 'because every TD is in a perpetual "audit-ready" state' Absolutely !!  We are in a regulated field so our processes, procedures, documentation, records, and activities always need to be ready for auditing or inspection.  When a new companies registers with the FDA, I inevitably get asked the question, 'When can we expect the US FDA to perform an inspection?'  The answer - any time.  So you always have to be ready.  Technical Documentation, whether you have 1 file or 100 files, under the EU MDR is not something sitting on a shelf, they are living, breathing, beating components of an organisation and needs to be ready for review, audit, or inspection at any time.


    ------------------------------
    Richard Vincins RAC
    Vice President Global Regulatory Affairs
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: IVDR and Technical Documentation sampling plan

    Posted 18-Jun-2021 08:02
    Dear Corey,

    I would like to add that it is essential to build well designed B-UDI Strategy.

    As sampling will be performed as defined in MDR and MDCG 2019-13, will be based on the Basic UDI-DI that legal manufacturer defines.
    A sampling out of the sampling is not allowed in MDR/ IVDR. This means that NB is not allowed to pick us 1 article of 10 variants included under 1(one) Basic UDI-DI. They will need to assess them all. NB need written evidence that all variants including accessories covered by the TD have been included in the TDAR. This can also have an effect on the pricing of the TDA.

    References:

    https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70218/1/               

    https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/sampling.html                   





    ------------------------------
    Katarzyna Chrusciel
    Chemical, Clinical and Materials Engineer
    Italy
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: IVDR and Technical Documentation sampling plan

    Posted 18-Jun-2021 11:51
    Thanks so much for your helpful responses, all!

    ------------------------------
    Corey Jaseph RAC
    Director of Regulatory Affairs
    Wheatland CA
    United States
    ------------------------------