Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Topical gel Syringe change - plastic to glass

    Posted 05-May-2020 11:24
    Hi all,
    I'd welcome some thoughts on the post-approval situation outlined below;

    Topical sterile (autoclave) gel product currently in plastic syringe (+applicator) with future potential change to glass syringe - what data package is required for EU.
     
    Top of my head thoughts;
    • Sterilisation cycle optimisation & validation - no phase separation
    • Leachables/extractables
    • Drug product stability - minimum 6 months long term/accelerated, assuming highly stable, would enable maintaining current shelf-life of 24 months at a push with extra data provision during review.

    Anything missing in particular that I need purely from a device perspective?

    Any comparative assessment - plastic v glass syringe?

    Thanks in anticipation of your support,
    Roy Jamieson
    Regulatory CMC Consultant












  • 2.  RE: Topical gel Syringe change - plastic to glass

    Posted 06-May-2020 02:39
    Hi Joy,

    I think you shall consider biological safety evaluation, not only leachables/extractables (chemical characterization).
    Of-course you have to start with the risk assessment to identify the potential hazards and hazardous situations.
    And also consider the package integrity. You may need a packaging validation. I do not know the details to tell you more about that.

    You will probably need to assess the change of materials to the finished product testing methods, such as endotoxins.

    Hope that helps

    ------------------------------
    Spyros Drivelos
    Medical Devices Expert, RAC
    Agia Paraskevi, Athens
    Greece
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Topical gel Syringe change - plastic to glass

    Posted 06-May-2020 07:51

    Dear Roy,

     

    You do not mention any important functions of the syringe/applicator, other than the Primary Packaging function for which you have identified testing to assess impact.  The determination of these functions (e.g. deliverable dose or dose accuracy) could provide important testing to verify that no impact on performance. Also, an assessment on the impact of the change on the usability could be required (particularly if the ergonomics/forces change) or patient risk would be prudent, which may identify additional required testing.  You also do not mention whether the applicator is the part that fulfills any functional role on providing for a safe or effective application and/or whether this is part of the change (or a separate product).  If separate, certainly impact on deliverable dose, attachment force and possible leakage are elements that could be assessed/compared.

     

    Overall the delivery function of this product must meet the Essential Requirements of Annex 1 of the MDD now, and/or the General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR) in Annex 1 of the MDR after May 2021.  Information supporting compliance must be in your technical file (or dossier).  If before May 2021, an assessment of the products conformance with applicable requirements (e.g. ER Checklist) will be need to be submitted.  After May 2021, a notified body opinion as to the conformance with the GSPR will need to be submitted.

     

    It is my recommendation to identify the functions performed by this product and assess compliance of the modified product with the above mentioned requirements.  This exercise is critical for identifying and ensuring the impact of any change is properly evaluated and justified as acceptable.  

     

    If this product has been on the market for a while, it is possible that none of this was done on this product or information provided to support the original submission. In that case, it will not be comparative, but a fully required exercise before submission. 

     

    Lee Leichter

    President

    P/L Biomedical

    10882 Stonington Avenue

    Fort Myers, FL 33913 USA

    Office: +1-239-244-1448

    Cell: +1-239-994-6488

    Email: leichter@plbiomedical.com

     

    May 5, 2020 11:24 AM

    Roy Jamieson

    Hi all,

    I'd welcome some thoughts on the post-approval situation outlined below;

     

    Topical sterile (autoclave) gel product currently in plastic syringe (+applicator) with future potential change to glass syringe - what data package is required for EU.

     

    Top of my head thoughts;

    • Sterilisation cycle optimisation & validation - no phase separation
    • Leachables/extractables
    • Drug product stability - minimum 6 months long term/accelerated, assuming highly stable, would enable maintaining current shelf-life of 24 months at a push with extra data provision during review.

     

    Anything missing in particular that I need purely from a device perspective?

     

    Any comparative assessment - plastic v glass syringe?

     

    Thanks in anticipation of your support,
    Roy Jamieson
    Regulatory CMC Consultant

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     






  • 4.  RE: Topical gel Syringe change - plastic to glass

    Posted 07-May-2020 03:13
    Dear Lee & Spyros,
    Many thanks for your invaluable advice - really appreciate your time in considering and providing deep insight.

    Kind regards,
    Roy Jamieson (BPharm Hons)
    Regulatory CMC Consultant