Yes, Anon, I believe MDCG 2021-25 provides a long-awaited and much needed practical interpretation of MDR Article 120 for legacy devices.
If you read the requirements listed in MDR Article 15, you can see that few of them can be applied to legacy devices, because they use terms such as
"obligations are complied with in accordance with Article 10(10)", or
"the statement referred to in Section 4.1 of Chapter II of Annex XV is issued". These requirements can be met only if the device concerned is CE marked against the MDR or is involved in a pre-market clinical study in accordance with the MDR, so cannot be applied to legacy devices.
However, if making vigilance reports to Eudamed for legacy devices, at that point the PRRC may need to be identified (see
MDCG 2019-5 which states:
"However, in case of serious incident or field safety corrective action to be reported during the 18 months referred to in point 1, where the legacy devices have not been registered in Eudamed yet, they must be registered at the moment of the serious incident/ field safety corrective action reporting").
In addition, for non-EU manufacturers (of both MDR-compliant and legacy devices), when registering with Eudamed, they have to complete an Authorised Representative (AR)
Mandate Summary, but you will note that identification of the AR's PRRC is not one of the required fields in the template.
------------------------------
Roger Gray
VP Quality and Regulatory
Donawa Lifescience Ltd
UK Responsible Person services
Christchurch, UK
+44 1425 489208
rgray@donawa.comwww.donawa.com------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 27-Oct-2021 21:44
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: PRRC and MDCG 2021-25
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hi ,
Has anybody checked the transitional provisions MDCG 2021-25, with respect to Article 15 - PRRC , it mentions 'not applicable' for legacy devices . I had assumed , we needed the PRRC even for complying with the Article 120(3) provisions? Is that not correct?