MDCG 2019-07 responds to this requirement (the requirement for medical device quality control) by giving a general referral to the organization's associated quality management system intended to ensure compliance "...
in the most effective manner..." and "...
proportionate to the risk class...".
Accordingly, my approach is that the PRRC assures compliance with this requirement by way of proper corresponding quality management system elements. Specifically, for high-risk devices, it may be suitably proportionate and most effective that the PRRC is the final approver of device releases (final, in-process, etc., commensurate with risk). In contrast, for low-risk devices, it may be enough that the PRRC simply review (such as via internal audit) the release records on a periodic basis, or perhaps even enough that the quality management system simply contains the appropriate QC provisions that are executed and audited by persons other than the PRRC.
------------------------------
Kevin Randall, ASQ CQA, RAC (Europe, U.S., Canada)
Principal Consultant
Ridgway, CO
United States
© Copyright 2022 by ComplianceAcuity, Inc. All rights reserved.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 21-Jan-2022 09:35
From: Malin Kylberg
Subject: Qualification requirements if performance of release is delegated by the PRRC?
According to MDCG2019 shall "The person responsible for regulatory compliance at least be responsible for
ensuring that:
(a) the conformity of the devices is appropriately checked, in accordance with the
quality management system under which the devices are manufactured, before a
device is released;"
If the performance of the release is delegated by the PPRC to another employee is it required that this individual then fulfills the PRRC qualification requirements?
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Malin
------------------------------
Malin Kylberg
Director QA & Regulatory Compliance
OssDsign
Uppsala
Sweden
------------------------------