Good news, most likely the device will be a Class II, as a general rule. Though by your asking about PMA submissions, perhaps your friend has a device that is novel and without predicate, so perhaps Class III. I've been involved with diagnostic imaging for several years, both from the technology development and the regulatory side, and we celebrate when they intersect. Feel free to reach out and I could share the battle scars and help answer the "regulatory" v "medical imaging" question. Better news, as you are finding, there is a lot of talent and expertise in the forum.
------------------------------
Larry Lugo
Consultant
Carlsbad CA
United States
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 17-Mar-2021 02:26
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: Consultant needed -- medical imaging
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hi -- my friend is developing a Class III medical imaging device and asked me to recommend a regulatory affairs consultant.
I am drawing a blank -- there probably aren't a lot of consultants with expertise in both PMA submissions and medical imaging as the few Class III imaging devices are generally submitted by large companies with their own inhouse RA departments.
If I had to pick either PMA experience or medical imaging, it seems to me that the medical imaging part is probably more important.
Any recommendations or advice?
Thank you.