Since central IRBs do everything electronically now, there isn't a benefit for them to be local or regional. I would pick one that gives you great service. We have been using Sterling IRB for years and have never had anything but excellent customer service.
To eliminate doubt for the IRB, I recommend you submit the study risk determination request to FDA. We've done 7 SRDs now and all have had a response in 28 days or less. Whether SR or NSR, the FDA determination letter is then submitted as an attachment to the IRB submission.
------------------------------
Kevin Hawkins, RAC
Director, Quality & Regulatory Affairs
Wilsonville OR
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-Mar-2017 10:55
From: Karen Bannick
Subject: Regional IRB Recommendations
I have a client in need of regional IRB for their small, likely NSR clinical study. In this case, the academic institution's IRB appears to not understand what NSR means how to review them. They referred the client to FDA for information--not an SR decision, but an IDK answer!
I haven't worked with a regional IRB for several years. Can anyone make some recommendations? This particular study will be in CA.
Thank you in advance!
------------------------------
Karen Bannick MA, RAC, FRAPS
Principal & Founder
Bannick Consulting LLC
karen@bannickconsulting.com
------------------------------