This is correct should be an individual authorised to sign on behalf of the company, so regardless of the position there should be a clear definition of who this individual is signing these regulatory documents, i.e. include in the job description roles and responsibilities to show they are authorised. In fact, under the EU MDR/IVDR based on Article 15 I would even infer the person responsible for regulatory compliance should be the individual signing all DofCs. If you read through the test in Article 15, they basically already have this responsibility, so if you include in your quality system the person responsible for regulatory compliance is person 'x', function 'y' then they would be default sign regulatory documents - thus the DofC. Also keep in mind if your responsible authorised person signing DofC leaves the company, make sure to update all DofCs ... I have seen so many times a DofC two years old with the same signature of the individual that has not worked at the company for over one year.
------------------------------
Richard Vincins RAC
Vice President Global Regulatory Affairs
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 02-Dec-2019 12:27
From: Jo Huang
Subject: Declaration of Conformity (MDD CLass III)
The DoC is signed off by the company's RA or QA representative, preferably from the upper management team. I normally go to the VP of RA/QA to sign these types of documents.
------------------------------
Jo Huang RAC
Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Athens TX
United States
Original Message:
Sent: 26-Nov-2019 05:19
From: Britta Cyron
Subject: Declaration of Conformity (MDD CLass III)
Hi all,
we had an interesting discussion at the office and came to no real conclusion:
Who should sign the Declaration of Conformity (DoC)?
At our company and others I have worked for, the quality management representative signs the DoC. With one of our suppliers, the technical manager signs the DoC.
I found a German guidance document (EK-Med 3.9 A4, text is in English) regarding DoC which states that it shall include the legally binding signature and function of the authorised person. However, it does not define the authorized person.
Thank you for your thoughts!
------------------------------
Britta Cyron
Bochum
Germany
------------------------------