Hi Marcello,
I am not aware of any specific examples, but I would see no reason that couldn't be possible. It would be unlikely that a manufacturer would provide product under expanded access for just a different indication if the product could be dosed with the marketed product. As a simple example, a 250 mg tablet was approved for once daily administration and a new indication required twice daily dosing. But, if an intravenous formulation was under development for the same or different indication, expanded access could be possible as long as the 3 conditions are met:
(1) The patient or patients to be treated have a serious or immediately life-threatening disease or condition, and there is no comparable or satisfactory alternative therapy to diagnose, monitor, or treat the disease or condition;
(2) The potential patient benefit justifies the potential risks of the treatment use and those potential risks are not unreasonable in the context of the disease or condition to be treated; and
(3) Providing the investigational drug for the requested use will not interfere with the initiation, conduct, or completion of clinical investigations that could support marketing approval of the expanded access use or otherwise compromise the potential development of the expanded access use.
------------------------------
Glen Park PharmD
Executive Director, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance
Jersey City NJ
United States
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 11-Feb-2019 12:55
From: Marcello Milano
Subject: Expanded Access
Hello
I have an interest in US Expanded Access Programs and have been looking for examples of EAPs for a new indication or for a new dose/dosage regimen of a drug already authorised by FDA in a different indication/dose/dosage regimen.
Is anyone aware of any publicly documented precedents? And is EA possible at all in such circumstances?
Thanks in advance for any thoughts or experience you may have,
Marcello
------------------------------
Marcello
------------------------------