Hi Neil,
I didn't take your response that way, just that you were looking at how the EU/NB might react, while I was looking at it from an FDA perspective. Arthur probably looked globally and settled on FDA as the applicable jurisdiction, which ultimately, it is. Now that everyone has put in their two cents, what I think is that those coins have two sides, and we have now thoroughly explored both of them, which is what we are here for, I think.
I think the main reason FDA would have no problem with it is that FDA knows that no one in the US cares about a CE Mark on a medical device, because everyone knows that a medical device must be FDA-whatevered to be sold in the US, and a CE Mark adds nothing to that. I think this would be called a false claim, but not a material false claim.
All that said, If I were trying to ship these devices into the US, I think I might be more interested in what customs thinks than FDA, but then I don't know a lot about customs.
------------------------------
Julie Omohundro, ex-RAC (US, GS), still an MBA
Principal Consultant
Class Three, LLC
Mebane, North Carolina, USA
919-544-3366 (T)
434-964-1614 (C)
julie@class3devices.com------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 14-Apr-2020 04:53
From: Neil Armstrong
Subject: CE mark effect in U.S
Hi Julie:
Sorry, I was not meaning to imply there was any extra-jurisdictional reach for a CE Mark, just that if it is applied as stated under the MDR, there must be an EUAR and EUAR's PRRC accepting responsibility in Europe. So if the manufacturer is outside Europe it is the EUAR and their PRRC that may be liable. The difficulty in the days of global trade and travel, if we ever return to them, is wherever the product is put on the market, it can end up in Europe and the onus is then on EUAR.
One of the intentions of the new regulations was to produce a more uniform approach to enforcement and prosecuting across the EU - maybe that is no longer likely in the post-Covid 19 world.
However, I believe there is an ethical concern: the CE mark is seen as a badge of safety and performance on which many people rely, and to put it on without proper sanction is as ethically wrong as sticking on other safety or compliance badge without proper authority ... just in the belief the product should pass. The other point is to remember what the CE signifies, that the product complies with all applicable European Regulations and Directives - it is just plain wrong for an ethical business not to take placing it in a product seriously.
------------------------------
Neil Armstrong FRAPS
CEO MeddiQuest Limited
Peterborough
United Kingdom
Original Message:
Sent: 14-Apr-2020 01:30
From: Julie Omohundro
Subject: CE mark effect in U.S
If it was fraud in the UK, then the UK must have recognized the CE Mark for market access. FDA does not. Besides, in the US, you only end up in jail for fraud if you stiff CMS. (That is sort of a joke.)
In the US, only the government can prosecute; all others must sue. If the NBs sued their customers for apply numbers incorrectly, I'm wondering if that was under the regulations, or per their contractual agreement with their customers. I've always been under the impression that the NBs have no legal enforcement authority.
------------------------------
Julie Omohundro, ex-RAC (US, GS), still an MBA
Principal Consultant
Class Three, LLC
Mebane, North Carolina, USA
919-544-3366 (T)
434-964-1614 (C)
julie@class3devices.com
Original Message:
Sent: 13-Apr-2020 05:47
From: Neil Armstrong
Subject: CE mark effect in U.S
Short answer just don't!
The CE Mark is applied based on a declaration of conformity made by you or your EUAR.
If you know that there is no such valid declaration based on a completed conformity assessment route, but still allow the CE to be applied, it is fraudulently applied.
A criminal offense has most likely been committed in the Manufacturers or EUAR's EU Member State.
Last year a company director was jailed for fraud in the UK.
Last year Notified Bodies prosecuted their customers for applying their numbers incorrectly.
... and just wait till your distributors' lawyers get a whiff of the size of civil damages they might receive!
Take the CE Mark seriously, if it not legal: brand it out, permanently obscure it with a tamper proof label or something similar.
... and if the declaration is under MDR - remember you now have the PRRC and EUAR to answer for the criminal and civil penalties.
Just Don't!
Neil
------------------------------
Neil Armstrong FRAPS
CEO MeddiQuest Limited
Peterborough
United Kingdom
Original Message:
Sent: 10-Apr-2020 09:55
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: CE mark effect in U.S
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hello everyone,
Would like to hear your thoughts on the following. We have received FDA clearance for a device which is currently also under review for MDR CE mark. The product has same label in US and EU and the CE mark appears on the label. My question here is can you sell your device in U.S once you have received your FDA clearance if your device has the CE mark symbol and CE mark is not yet granted? I know that CE mark produces effects only in the EU, however I believe it would be misleading to put on US marked a product which apparently states it is CE marked. Do you agree?
Many thanks to you all,