An SOP is a procedure that describes how to perform a process. The people who perfordure need to understand what the SOP says.
There could be minor changes that involve typos and don't require additional training, the procedure hasn't changed. In some system the revision level uses a letter. For these changes I add a number, indicating that there is a new revision that doesn't require training.
Other changes change the way to perform the process, so employees need to be away. Unless it is a major change, such as using a different piece of equipment that requires a different set-up, then reading the changes using highlighting or some other way to identify the change, will work.
If the procedure covers a validated process, then there are special training requirements. A good approach uses three steps: observe a trained operator, perform the process while being observed, and perform the process solo.
Training does not deteriorate or drift, so periodic training is not necessary. Instead, use audits and nonconformances to determine if the operator follows the procedure. If the procedure is correct, that may indicate a training need. However, don't fall into the trap of "retrain the operator" as the solution to a large number of nonconformances.
------------------------------
Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
Swanzey NH
United States
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 24-Nov-2021 18:08
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: QMS SOP Training
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
What is the recommended training policy (over QMS SOPs)?
Does this one make sense:
Employees will be trained on their SOPs for each:
1. Minor changes - Read and understand
2. Major change - frontal training or short video and training effectiveness
3. If not 1 and 2 - at least annually
My concern is that by this policy I am creating too much training that is not necessarily required.