Hello,
following on Tom's reply, while a new CTA is required for each new study (or expansion of study), a cross-reference (via a so-called "simplified" IMPD) to a previously submitted and approved IMPD is in principle admissible in most countries, and accepted by most health authorities. There are exceptions, however. For instance, Health Canada does not accept cross-reference of a phase 2 CTA to a phase 1 CTA; BfArM and Swissmedic do not typically allow for such cross-references. Needless to say, a resubmission may trigger another round of review; hence the potential advantage of cross-referencing.
Maurizio Franzini
------------------------------
Maurizio Franzini
Regulatory Affairs CMC, Associate Director
San Francisco CA
United States
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 07-Nov-2021 22:45
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: Is a new IMPD required...
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Is a new IMPD required if an additional clinical study utilizes the exact same API, drug product formulation, manufacturers, container closure, etc? The new study is part of the disease progression. Dosage and delivery are the same. There will of course be a new clinical protocol.