Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Is a new IMPD required...

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 08-Nov-2021 16:39
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Is a new IMPD required if an additional clinical study utilizes the exact same API, drug product formulation, manufacturers, container closure, etc?  The new study is part of the disease progression.  Dosage and delivery are the same.  There will of course be a new clinical protocol.


  • 2.  RE: Is a new IMPD required...

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 08-Nov-2021 21:58
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Basically you are saying no changes to the CMC section of the original IND/clinical study and you are planning to use the same API/DP for the second study? Then it's not a new IMPD and thus not required to submit the CMC section, just do cross reference!


  • 3.  RE: Is a new IMPD required...

    Posted 09-Nov-2021 11:54
    In the EU, each clinical study requires submission of a unique Clinical Trial Application (CTA). As opposed to US where every study protocol is submitted to the same application (IND). I'm not aware whether EU allows you to cross reference the IMPD from one CTA to another.  You may have to re-submit the IMPD with the new CTA.  But to answer your question, you can submit the same IMPD (same version) in the new CTA.

    ------------------------------
    Tom Stothoff
    Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs CMC
    Chicago
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Is a new IMPD required...

    Posted 11-Nov-2021 14:44
    Hello,

    following on Tom's reply, while a new CTA is required for each new study (or expansion of study), a cross-reference (via a so-called "simplified" IMPD) to a previously submitted and approved IMPD is in principle admissible in most countries, and accepted by most health authorities. There are exceptions, however. For instance, Health Canada does not accept cross-reference of a phase 2 CTA to a phase 1 CTA; BfArM and Swissmedic do not typically allow for such cross-references.  Needless to say, a resubmission may trigger another round of review; hence the potential advantage of cross-referencing.

    Maurizio Franzini

    ------------------------------
    Maurizio Franzini
    Regulatory Affairs CMC, Associate Director
    San Francisco CA
    United States
    ------------------------------