Hello Andrew,
This is an interesting question! I think like all filing systems, it's very personal and dependent on the kind of work you're doing, how many geographies you're working in, etc. But I always think it's helpful to see how different companies manage it, to help get ideas. For context, we're a small medical device company with a few products and a regulatory team of 5.
Our regulatory folders are on our Windows file server. Within the top-level Regulatory folder, we have lots of subfolders, including Correspondence, Submissions, Intelligence, Education and Training, etc.
The Submissions folder is split out by geography (we use ISO 2-letter codes for consistency). Within each geography, we have folders for each main project (e.g., a specific clinical trial or marketing submission). Then under those, we have individual sequential folders for each submission. Those folders contain the submission itself, plus all the working files and related correspondence specific to that submission. For example the folder structure might look like this:
Submissions--US
----IDE XXXXXX
-------00_Initial Submission
-----------Correspondence
-----------Final Submission
-----------Working Folders
-----PMA XXXXXX
-------00_Initial Submission
-----------Correspondence
-----------Final Submission
-----------Working Folders
-------01_Suppl <Brief Description>
etc.
Within Correspondence, we store correspondence that is not related to a specific submission, again separated out by geography and then again into subfolders when appropriate.
We maintain a consistent naming convention for the folders and for individual files, using YYMMDD at the start of each file name so they sort in order. The biggest help in maintaining this consistency is having a single person responsible for filing. We have a separate top-level "Regulatory Working" folder that is our active folder, and when a project is ready to be filed, it's sent to a single person who moves it over to the final folder. Very few of us in the department have write access to our final Regulatory folder. This may be unconventional but has greatly helped in ensuring everything is filed consistently and is thus reasonably easy to find. (We found that otherwise, even with training, everyone tended to file things slightly differently.) This person also keeps logs of what is filed, which can be helpful if searching for a specific file.
Overall this system works extremely well for us. If we had a large number of projects, top-level folders by project would probably be needed but we do fine without them. Also, it would be better if everything was stored in a proper file management program, which would allow more comprehensive searching. But on the plus side, it's free...and in most cases, searching within Windows (doing a full text search) works OK, although it's slow.
Hope this gives you some ideas!
Jennifer
------------------------------
Jennifer Cabralda, RAC (US, CAN)
Director, Regulatory Affairs
Richmond, BC, Canada
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 26-Jun-2020 11:06
From: Andrew Hadd
Subject: Tips for Organizing Communication and Regulatory Folders
Dear RAPS,
Would anyone have or be willing to share their tips, tricks or best practice advice for organizing their regulatory files and folders. These folders would store pdfs, documents and other resources for our team on a shared local "hard-drive." What ways have you sorted and organized communication with the FDA or other agencies? What have you done that might have helped everyone on the team find old and file new information? Are there structures you put in place a few years ago that you might now regret (in terms of file naming or access or sort method). I appreciate any recommendations here and wish you all well today. Thank you.
------------------------------
Andrew Hadd
Director of Regulatory Affairs
Austin TX
United States
------------------------------