Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  IVDR - Specification / Standard Reference

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 12-Mar-2020 16:47
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    For IVDR… will a Notified Bodies accept data/test records compliant to a current applicable CLSI document?  or does the cited Specification / Standard Reference (and data/record generated) need to be compliant to an EN or say ISO standard?
    All comments appreciated.


  • 2.  RE: IVDR - Specification / Standard Reference

    Posted 14-Mar-2020 10:18
    Edited by Richard Vincins 14-Mar-2020 10:19
    I have used CLSI standards as part of the performance testing documentation in the Technical File for an old List B product that was accepted.  Under the EU MDR, not quite sure because there are going to be lots more performance testing reports being provided as part of Technical Documentation.  With that said, the CLSI standards does not really have any strong counter-part in the EU, there are a couple ISO standards.  Personally, I would/will be using the CLSI standards as part of performance testing of IVDs since they are well recognised and well-established standards to follow for analytical testing.  How Notified Bodies will accept them - it varies between Notified Bodies, so I would definitely have the conversation with your reviewer of technical documentation.

    ------------------------------
    Richard Vincins RAC
    Vice President Global Regulatory Affairs
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: IVDR - Specification / Standard Reference

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 16-Mar-2020 09:32
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    thank you Richard - great help!


  • 4.  RE: IVDR - Specification / Standard Reference

    Posted 15-Mar-2020 08:21
    With an increased emphasis on "state-of-the-art" we are seeing additional requests from Notified Bodies to show compliance with standards that are not harmonized. If the CLSI is the most appropriate standard I would not hesitate to use it to support the IVD. Of course, listing your rationale for that selection in the technical documentation will go a long way to support it.  ​

    ------------------------------
    Nancy Morrison RAC
    Executive Director Regulatory and Quality Consulting Services
    Monroeville PA
    United States
    ------------------------------