Hello,
There is no issue with co-sponsorship. It is common when you have 2 separate pharma companies involved in the development of the same drug. The main point here is to have clearly documented how the co-sponsors are involved in the development of the product and what their responsibilities are.
Sub-contracting to CRO is different - even if the sponsor sub-contract work to the CRO it is still the sponsor's responsibility to oversee the whole clinical trial and the CRO performance.
If the CRO is a co-developing partner then it will be a different situation - similar to what I explained initially with the co-sponsors.
Have a great week,
Olga
------------------------------
Olga Peycheva
Regulatory and Study Start Up Specialist
Solutions OP Ltd
olga.peycheva@solutionsop.co.ukUnited Kingdom
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 15-Sep-2023 16:54
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: Clinical Trial Co-Sponsorship
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
A colleague asked if it is possible for two companies to be listed as co-sponsors of a clinical trial.
I see no reference of co-sponsorship when a sponsor is defined in 21 CFR 312.3. Further, it seems as though the concept of co-sponsorship would unnecessarily complicate a matter which could be addressed by having one company transfer obligations to the other company. However, given that the transfer of obligations is to a CRO, according to the regulation, how would that be handled if neither company is a CRO? Perhaps there are additional FDA requirements of which I am not aware?
Also, does it matter whether one company is located outside of the US, or whether the clinical trial is conducted in both US and ex-US regions?
Thank you! I appreciate any insights.