Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Clinical Trial Co-Sponsorship

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 15-Sep-2023 17:59
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    A colleague asked if it is possible for two companies to be listed as co-sponsors of a clinical trial.

    I see no reference of co-sponsorship when a sponsor is defined in 21 CFR 312.3. Further, it seems as though the concept of co-sponsorship would unnecessarily complicate a matter which could be addressed by having one company transfer obligations to the other company. However, given that the transfer of obligations is to a CRO, according to the regulation, how would that be handled if neither company is a CRO? Perhaps there are additional FDA requirements of which I am not aware?

    Also, does it matter whether one company is located outside of the US, or whether the clinical trial is conducted in both US and ex-US regions?

    Thank you! I appreciate any insights.



  • 2.  RE: Clinical Trial Co-Sponsorship

    Posted 18-Sep-2023 06:44

    Hello,

    There is no issue with co-sponsorship. It is common when you have 2 separate pharma companies involved in the development of the same drug. The main point here is to have clearly documented how the co-sponsors are involved in the development of the product and what their responsibilities are. 

    Sub-contracting to CRO is different - even if the sponsor sub-contract work to the CRO it is still the sponsor's responsibility to oversee the whole clinical trial and the CRO performance. 

    If the CRO is a co-developing partner then it will be a different situation - similar to what I explained initially with the co-sponsors. 

    Have a great week,

    Olga



    ------------------------------
    Olga Peycheva
    Regulatory and Study Start Up Specialist
    Solutions OP Ltd
    olga.peycheva@solutionsop.co.uk
    United Kingdom
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Clinical Trial Co-Sponsorship

    Posted 18-Sep-2023 08:18

    For the US FDA I don't think a concept of co-sponsorship exists in the sense of the 21 CFR 312 regulation of clinical trials. Someone has to file the IND and maintain it, i.e., own it. It would not be productive or efficient for both companies to file a single protocol to both INDs. If a company not holding the IND takes certain responsibility for regulatory requirements, that obligation can be easily and clearly transferred. Keep in mind that business arrangements can allow for co-development and both companies can bear responsibilities for conducting the clinical trial, but only one can hold an IND.



    ------------------------------
    Glen Park PharmD
    Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance
    Burien WA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Clinical Trial Co-Sponsorship

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 18-Sep-2023 13:54
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    IND holder and a sponsorship of an IND are two different things! Agree one IND holder in the US but one could have two sponsors!