We usually have separate tests listed on the specification for Appearance and Visible Particles. That doesn't preclude you from assessing them in the same test.
For the appearance, we use the Ph.Eur. test and standards, so the specification will be something like "Not more colored than reference standard BY3". In the description, such as appears in the label, we will use something like what you state: "colorless to slightly yellow/brown".
Note that the EU at least also requires a clarity specification for parenterals (eg, clear to slightly opaque), which is tested against a defined set of standards in the Ph.Eur. (eg, reference suspension III).
------------------------------
Rachel Thornton
Associate Director
Smyrna GA
United States
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-Jun-2022 16:25
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: CMC - Drug substance and Drug product description (appearance)
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hello, community,
We are producing mAb drugs for phase I studies.
The Description/Appearance specification for DS is "colorless to slightly yellow/brown solution."
The Description/Appearance specification for DP is "colorless to slightly yellow/brown solution; essentially free of visible particles"
My questions are:
1) Are these specifications make sense? Should we separate the "essentially free of visible particles" from Description/Appearance? Because the "essentially free of visible particles" is determined by inspecting all vials after aseptic filling?
2) I understand that the method to determine the Appearance is "Visual." Our current SOP uses Light Box, but I think the method is more suitable for detecting visible particles. Color seems to be subjective. How do you determine Description/Appearance? What essential information shall be in the SOP?
Thank you.