Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  EU MDR - Technical Files - Old model discontinued

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 05-Apr-2024 09:31
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    We are class I (non sterile, non measuring) medical devices manufacturer and selling medical devices of one GMDN code but different models.
    2-3 years ago, we decided to discontinue one of the old model and provided replacement with new model.

    Few technical files such as Production description and classification rationale, GSPR, etc. still have details of our old model. 
    Should I remove previous model details when I revise Production description and classification rationale, GSPR, etc. tech files or leave it like it and add new models details?

    Note: 
    We do provide warranty of chairs 2 years only
    However, our clients still use product after 2 years by getting replacement of damaged parts.

    We are not providing any expiry date so what would be TPLC in this case?

    We decided to keep device master records separate for each model but few tech files such as GSPR, Applicable standard list, etc. combined (applicable to every model)

    RA experts, your valuable opinion would be highly appreciated. 

    Thanks - Arslan 



  • 2.  RE: EU MDR - Technical Files - Old model discontinued

    Posted 05-Apr-2024 10:21

    In this case your conformity assessment path is EU-MDR Article 52(7)(1st sentence).

    First you prepare the Annex II and the Annex III technical documentation and then prepare the Article 19 Declaration of Conformity, DoC.

    As you make changes, the three documents must stay synchronized. If you discontinue a model, then that should change the Annex II, Annex III, and DoC. Retain the prior versions for the record retention period. Provide the new versions to the Authorized Representative.

    So in particular, you should revise the three documents to remove the information about the old models.

    Also, the EU doesn't use GMDN codes any more, so you need to add the EMDN codes. (I don't see a problem with leaving the GMDN codes in the documents.)

    If the models are similar, then having them all covered by the same three documents is sensible. Similar means that are all in the same EN ISO 13485:2016/A11:2021 4.2.3 Medical Device File (because they are in the same medical device family) and have the same Basic UDI-DI.



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: EU MDR - Technical Files - Old model discontinued

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 05-Apr-2024 17:06
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Well explained and thanks for clarification. Please clarify below question as well about TPLC in our case.

    We do provide warranty of chairs 2 years only
    However, our clients still use product after 2 years by getting replacement of damaged parts.

    We are not providing any expiry date so what would be TPLC in this case?




  • 4.  RE: EU MDR - Technical Files - Old model discontinued

    Posted 06-Apr-2024 04:00

    If I understand correctly, you have device family (one Basic UDI-DI) with multiple device models, all in Class I, self-certified. One of the models will no longer be placed on the market, but they will remain in use. That model is still referred to in the technical documentation. Your question is, if that model should be removed.

    The answer is: no, keep it in. For now, you have to keep performing post-market surveillance and for doing that effectively, you need the technical documentation. Having this extra information in the files does not interfere with information that is relevant for the devices that are still being made available. If you want to make the technical documentation easy to 'read', you may add a market to the discontinued model, but that is not mandatory. 

    Obviously, the rest of the technical documentation must be fully in line with the MDR, including the structure of Annexes II and III and the GSPR checklist of Annex I. Update the PMS report at least every five years. When doing that, I recommend to pay attention to developments in similar devices and alternative clinical strategies as part of PMCF. The bottom line in the PMS report is the answer to the question if the risks are still acceptable when weight against the clinical benefits, in the context of the state-of-the-art in acceptability of those risks. Even for a 'simple' Class I device, you have to do this. 



    ------------------------------
    Ronald Boumans
    MDR Expert
    Super PRRC
    Netherlands
    ------------------------------