This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hello, it is important to carefully read the second sentence in the guidance:
"Many sponsors submit the 1572 to FDA, however, because it collects, in one place, information that must be submitted to FDA under 21 CFR 312.23(a)(6)(iii)(b)."
As others have alluded to, you do need to provide most of the information that is on the 1572, as it is required by 21 CFR 312.23(a)(6)(iii)(b); this information includes subinvestigators, research facilities, and IRB information. Your choice is to provide the 1572, where the information is already collected, or to provide that information in a separate document. It is typically much simpler to just provide the 1572.
I would note that this investigator information is required when new protocols are submitted to the IND, it is not just for an initial IND. For purposes of regulatory submissions, the investigator information is part of the protocol. I always ask Clinical to get this information on at least one investigator for new studies to submit with the protocol (Protocol Amendment: New Protocol) to meet the requirement. Even though I would not advocate omitting the investigator information with a new protocol, since it is required, I would agree that FDA is much less likely to put the study on clinical hold if you omit this required information for a new protocol under an IND that is already in effect.
Original Message:
Sent: 05-Apr-2023 14:25
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: Form 1572 Requirement for Initial IND
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
We have always submitted Form 1572 from at least one investigator with initial INDs, and it seems most people in this forum do as well. However, when reviewing the "Information Sheet Guidance for Sponsors, Clinical Investigators, and IRBs - Frequently Asked Questions – Statement of Investigator (Form FDA 1572)", the answer to Question 6 (Does the 1572 need to be submitted to FDA?) clearly states that there is no need to submit Form 1572. Am I missing a more recent FDA Guidance or is this mostly done out of an abundance of caution?