Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Incident Reporting to Regulatory Authorities

    Posted 08-Jan-2024 14:21

    Hello QARA Professionals,

    We are Class I (Self declaration) Canada based medical devices manufacturer and shipping devices mainly to US, Canada, Europe, UK, Switzerland, Australia.
    Unfortunately, we got a complaint from Canadian customer that he got cut in his body that led to 3-4 stiches. Thank God, there is no death issue or wound is healable.
    We never had such issue previously. 

    As an expert, what you'd suggest me. 
    Should I report to HC as I'm not sure if it matches the serious health deterioration definition.
    If yes, then I need to report to Health Canada within 10 days, please correct me if I'm wrong.
    Do you know form, which I should use to report HC?


    Do I also need to report other regulatory bodies such as MHRA, FDA , EU Regulatory authority, EU-REP, etc.
    Please keep in mind, incident occurred in Canada. 

    Your guidance would be highly appreciated.

    Thank you,



    ------------------------------
    Arslan Rahat
    QARA Manager
    Toronto ON
    Canada
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Incident Reporting to Regulatory Authorities

    Posted 08-Jan-2024 15:58

    Hello Arslan

    A good rule of thumb is - when in doubt, you should report. Having said that, you should look up criteria in Part 803 for FDA requirements. 

    From a risk management point of view, you should analyze this incident to see if you should consider recognizing this as a potential harm. You mention that you have not had this issue previously. It is clear though that the patient was hurt requiring medical intervention. It would be good to look closely to see if there was any misuse, including intentional acts and use-errors. Now that you have become aware, it should be treated as foreseeable and reasonable.

    I am sure other colleagues here on the forum will offer more tailored advice with respect to reportability. My interest, and expertise is in risk management.

    Best regards



    ------------------------------
    Naveen Agarwal, Ph.D.
    Problem Solver | Knowledge Sharer.
    Let's Talk Risk!
    @https://naveenagarwalphd.substack.com/
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Incident Reporting to Regulatory Authorities

    Posted 09-Jan-2024 04:23

    Hello Arslan,

    I agree that if any doubt or not sure, better to report and have the regulatory agency send a nice friendly note saying thank you for letting us know.  While most regulatory agencies have the definition of serious injury being similar, you would need to look at each of the regulatory requirements to ensure the proper reporting is done according to the definition.  I could not provide any comment if this should be reportable or not without understanding the device type, situation, and how the injury was completely resolved.  However, by some basics of the definitions an injury which required (surgical) intervention would be reportable.  If this happened in Canada, then it would only be reported in Canada.  Almost all regulatory agency serious incident/adverse event reporting would only be done in that country if the event occurred in that specific country.



    ------------------------------
    Richard Vincins ASQ-CQA, MTOPRA, RAC
    Vice President Global Regulatory Affairs
    Oriel STAT A MATRIX - ENTERPRISE
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Incident Reporting to Regulatory Authorities

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 09-Jan-2024 16:42
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Most regulators only want to hear about in-country incidents. US, Japan, and Malaysia are some of the jurisdictions with more interest in foreign events. From the US guidance:

    4.11.3 I'm a foreign manufacturer of a device that has been cleared or approved in the US and is also lawfully marketed in a foreign country. If an adverse event occurs in a foreign country with the device, must the event in the foreign country be reported under the MDR regulation?

    Yes, FDA considers an event that occurs in a foreign country reportable under the MDR regulation if it involves a device that has been cleared or approved in the US – or a device similar to a device marketed by the manufacturer that has been cleared or approved in the US – and is also lawfully marketed in a foreign country. Devices may be manufactured to slightly modified specifications to meet standards in different countries. If these changes do not substantially alter the performance of the device, then any device events that are MDR reportable events relating to such modified devices should be reported under the MDR regulation (see section 2.14 of this guidance). 




  • 5.  RE: Incident Reporting to Regulatory Authorities

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 09-Jan-2024 08:31
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Hello Arslan

    Yes, it's 10 days. If it wan't abnormal use and you don't know whether there would have been a permanent damage without those stitches, it needs to be reported.

    One of the conditions of your MDEL is that you have detailed procedures in place to guide you in reporting, and also in case of recalls, where you may need to act very quickly. As soon as this report is done, you should review that requirement and fill the gaps in your quality system documentation.

    Here's the form, and some useful guidance:

    https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medeffect-canada/adverse-reaction-reporting/mandatory-medical-device-problem-reporting-form-industry-adverse-reaction-reporting.html

    https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/reports-publications/medeffect-canada/incident-reporting-medical-devices-guidance-2021.html

    https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/compliance-enforcement/problem-reporting/guidance-investigation-reported-medical-device-problems-0065.html

    https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/compliance-enforcement/establishment-licences/directives-guidance-documents-policies/guidance-medical-device-establishment-licensing-0016/document.html

    https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/medical-device-reporting-manufacturers




  • 6.  RE: Incident Reporting to Regulatory Authorities

    Posted 10-Jan-2024 04:46

    Hello Arslan,

    If you device is on the market in the UK then you have to report the incident to MHRA via the MORE portal. If you device is not available in the UK you don't need to report it.

    You can find more information here

    I am copying below the reporting criteria in the UK for your convenience. 

    Any event which meets all three reporting criteria below is considered an adverse incident and must be reported to the MHRA:

    • an event has occurred. This includes situations where testing performed on the device, examination of the information supplied with the device, or any scientific information indicates some factor that could lead, or has led, to an event
    • the manufacturer's device is suspected to be a contributory cause of the incident
    • the event resulted in, or might have resulted, in death or a serious deterioration in state of health of a patient, user or other person

    Not all adverse incidents result in death or a serious deterioration in health. These may have been prevented because of other circumstances, or because of intervention. Therefore, you must still send us a report if:

    • an incident associated with a device happened, AND
    • if it occurred again, it might lead to death or serious deterioration in health

    Have a great week,

    Olga



    ------------------------------
    Olga Peycheva
    Regulatory and Study Start Up Specialist (Clinical trials)
    Solutions OP Ltd
    https://solutionsop.co.uk/
    United Kingdom
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Incident Reporting to Regulatory Authorities

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 10-Jan-2024 08:54
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Hello Arslan,

    Stitches/sutures could be considered a surgical intervention to preclude serious deterioration of health. In Canada, the definition of serious deterioration in health includes "unexpected medical or surgical intervention to prevent such a disease...".  Therefore, without additional information on medical necessity of the intervention or more information on the cause of the injury, then would fall under the definition of a serious incident."