Regulatory Open Forum

Management Review Research
I hope everyone is having a great week.  I am trying to gather background information on the effectiveness of MRM.  This information will support a digital transformation learning tool.
1. Do you feel the MRM is effective with excitive leaders?
2. Would it help if your MRM could be proactive before your set meetings per your SOPs?
    This could be accomplished using different Systems of Records to create a dashboard with current standing based on your KPIs.

1. It depends on the leaders. With the good ones, absolutely yes. They are active in reviewing the data, asking questions and suggesting new items of value to monitor. With the bad ones, they intentionally don't care and view quality as a cost and burden. No MR going will change them. With those who are simply new to the space or uninformed, the MR can be a good tool for educating them, but it also depends on the quality leader and their willingness to teach and to be forceful when needed.
   
   2. not sure what you mean by "be proactive before your set meetings"
   
   3. many companies already have some level of dashboard that they use for quality metrics, not sure what would be different?
   
   g-

Management Review Research
I hope everyone is having a great week.  I am trying to gather background information on the effectiveness of MRM.  This information will support a digital transformation learning tool.
1. Do you feel the MRM is effective with excitive leaders?
2. Would it help if your MRM could be proactive before your set meetings per your SOPs?
    This could be accomplished using different Systems of Records to create a dashboard with current standing based on your KPIs.