If the accessory inherently meets the jurisdiction's official (i.e., statutory; legislative, etc.) definition of "medical device", such as the EU MDR's Article 2(1), then the symbol is appropriate and expected. In that case, the "accessory" instead needs to just be categorized as a "medical device", not an accessory.
In contrast, the U.S. includes the term "accessory" in its statutory definition for device, in which case the MD symbol (if used at all for a U.S. label) would be expected for an accessory.
Canada's statutory definition of device, like the U.S.'s, includes "accessory", and thus would be handled like the U.S., where the MD symbol (if used at all) would be expected for an accessory.
------------------------------
Kevin Randall, ASQ CQA, RAC (Europe, U.S., Canada)
Principal Consultant
Ridgway, CO
United States
© Copyright 2022 by ComplianceAcuity, Inc. All rights reserved.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 30-Aug-2022 04:04
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: MD Symbol for accessory
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Is the MD symbol (taken from ISO 15223-1:2021) required also for accessories Lebel?