Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  MDR transition extension required documents

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 10-Oct-2023 09:04
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Dear Community,

    The documents required to demonstrate extension of MDD CE marking as per EU regulation 2023/607 amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 as regards the transitional provisions for certain medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices Q&A Rev.

    1. Manufacturer self-declaration confirming that the conditions for the extension are fulfilled, stating the end date of the transition period. Such self-declaration could be based on a harmonised template. Such self-declaration should clearly identify the devices covered by the extension and certificates concerned.
    2. 'Confirmation letter' issued by the notified body stating the receipt of the manufacturer's application for conformity assessment and the conclusion of a written agreement. Such confirmation should clearly identify the devices covered by the extension and certificates concerned. Such confirmation letter could be based on a harmonized template

    We have been submitting those for health authorities for many EU countries requesting them for registration and tender purposes. However, we got the information that those documents are to be only provided for for class III products based on a notified body's non official feedback.

    Can anyone advise if they heard a similar news?

    Thanks 



  • 2.  RE: MDR transition extension required documents

    Posted 11-Oct-2023 03:15

    I have not heard that feedback, which would also be utterly wrong if that feedback were actually given. Which EU Member States have given you that feedback and was this literally what you recevied as message?

    These documents are also not required but optional and the Q&A about Regulation (EU) 607/2023 only applies to MDR devices, not IVDR devices. 

    What I do know is that there is widespread confusion and misinformation about what may be required for proving that a particular certficate, CE marking for a class I up classified device or an Annex XIII declaration for custom made class III implantable device needing a QMS certification is valid pursuant to that regulation. Unfortunately also many authorities in the Union and outside have no idea how to apply this and do not allow themselves to be convinced by external parties. 



    ------------------------------
    Erik Vollebregt
    Partner
    Amsterdam
    Netherlands
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: MDR transition extension required documents

    Posted 11-Oct-2023 05:12

    Hi Anon,

    I have not heard similar feedback. In addition I am not sure if secondary information on a non-official NB's feedback is helpful here (or if the information is more detailed, then please share the actual wording).

    As far a I can see the current practice on what documents to request for confirming certain devices are covered by the extension seems not very harmonized. In consequence I assume you will need to consider it on a case-by-case basis (and probably receive some strange requests along the way).

    Best regards

    Christoph



    ------------------------------
    Christoph Kiesselbach
    Reutlingen
    Germany
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: MDR transition extension required documents

    Posted 11-Oct-2023 06:24

    Anon,

    I have not heard of this either - this seems quite off and you say 'EU countries' so presuming more than one.  Indeed it would be interesting to know which countries are requiring this information because it is not consistent with the requirements.



    ------------------------------
    Richard Vincins ASQ-CQA, MTOPRA, RAC
    Vice President Global Regulatory Affairs
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: MDR transition extension required documents

    Posted 12-Oct-2023 12:49

    This has been requested but by our EU Importers/Distributors.  We produced the exact documents you mentioned above for the EU Distributors at their request.

    1. Manufacturer self-declaration confirming that the conditions for the extension are fulfilled, stating the end date of the transition period. Such self-declaration could be based on a harmonised template. Such self-declaration should clearly identify the devices covered by the extension and certificates concerned.
    2. 'Confirmation letter' issued by the notified body stating the receipt of the manufacturer's application for conformity assessment and the conclusion of a written agreement. Such confirmation should clearly identify the devices covered by the extension and certificates concerned. Such confirmation letter could be based on a harmonized template.

    Kind Regards,

    Gloria



    ------------------------------
    Gloria Ferko RAC
    Palmerton PA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: MDR transition extension required documents

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 13-Oct-2023 08:39
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Hello All,

    Thank you for your feedback!

    I cite Netherlands and Slovenia for example who specifically request these documents for tenders. Turkey request them for registration purposes . Outside EU countries as well. 

    The feedback from the NB said that that those documents are to be only provided for Class III products.




  • 7.  RE: MDR transition extension required documents

    Posted 13-Oct-2023 10:52

    Hi Anon,

    thanks for the additional information. I guess this still reflects what we were talking about before: There is no mandatory legal requirement in the extension what exactly should be provided as proof, authorities may make the provision of these documents a requirement for certain purposes, and currently there is no clear harmonization on that.

    I still do not see any indication why this should be restricted to class III devices and I have no idea why the NB weighed in with this opinion.

    Best regards, Christoph



    ------------------------------
    Christoph Kiesselbach
    Reutlingen
    Germany
    ------------------------------