Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  medical furniture classification and requirements - US and EU

    Posted 28-Mar-2023 11:13

    Hi all, 

    We are a medical device company that produces exoskeletons for patients with lower limbs impairments. Our R&D team is working on the design of a manually operated chair with wheels that can be used for two purposes:

    • as a starting point for the exoskeleton (and the patient inside it) to stand-up at the beginning of a session. The patient is installed in the exoskeleton in seated position. Chairs need to meet specific requirements in terms of weight to be hold (patient + device),  height, width, etc. and today we did not manage to find one that suits well our needs and that we can recommend to clients.
    • to transport the exoskeleton (without the patient) in the rehab center from one room to another (similar to a cart).

    We see this chair like a piece of furniture and not a medical device nor an accessory to a medical device. Please note that the chair should not be confused with a wheelchair and we don't intend to use it to aid the locomotion of the patient. The presence of wheels has the only purpose of make the chair more manageable and to facilitate the transport of the medical device (the exoskeleton) across the rehab facility.

    I am struggling to find info on how to classify this device both for US and EU, whether we should apply specific regulations in US or directives in EU or specific standards. We currently hold a 510k and CE mark under MDR for the device.

    Any comment or insight would be highly appreciated.

    Thanks in advance

    Maria



    ------------------------------
    Maria Iacono, PhD
    Paris
    France
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: medical furniture classification and requirements - US and EU

    Posted 29-Mar-2023 02:10

    I can see parts of IEC 60601-1 or AAMI ES 60601-1, like the applicable mechanical tests that may apply to this chair:

    Mobile equipment provided with wheel locks or braking system - test requirements 9.4.3.1 in transport position & 9.4.3.2 excluding transport position

    Dynamic forces due to loading from persons (like on a seat with the exoskeleton in your case) per 9.8.3.3

    There could be other mechanical hazards based on clause 9, (also refer to table 19) which will help figure out if other mechanical hazards may apply.

    Also, there is the standard IEC 80601-2-78 on medical robots for rehabilitation, assessment, compensation or alleviation.  Refer to section 201.9.8 on Mechanical Hazards associated with support systems and see if any of those requirements may apply or are appropriate for your device.



    ------------------------------
    Leonard (Leo) Eisner, P.E.
    The "IEC 60601 Guy"
    Principal Consultant, Eisner Safety Consultants
    Mobile: (503) 709-8328
    Email: Leo@EisnerSafety.com
    Website: www.EisnerSafety.com
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: medical furniture classification and requirements - US and EU

    Posted 29-Mar-2023 12:06

    Hi Maria,

    Based on all the other regulatory responses you will need to decide how to go if the device is considered a medical device an accessory to a medical device or a not a medical device.  No matter what your decision you will want to do some testing of the chair itself to some standards and the closest ones I can think of that consider medical devices are the 60601-1 series of standards as noted above.  Some of the compliance requirements may not fully apply but you can modify the requirements to meet your needs to cover the intent.  Some labeling requirements, risk analysis considerations may also come into play that should also be considered that are in these standards as well, of the standards mentioned in my previous reply.



    ------------------------------
    Leonard (Leo) Eisner, P.E.
    The "IEC 60601 Guy"
    Principal Consultant, Eisner Safety Consultants
    Mobile: (503) 709-8328
    Email: Leo@EisnerSafety.com
    Website: www.EisnerSafety.com
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: medical furniture classification and requirements - US and EU

    Posted 29-Mar-2023 04:49

    Hi Maria:

    You can have physically the same exoskeleton, but the intended use is what will determine whether it is a medical device. For example: if it is intended to help a fit person pick up a heavy weight of box in a warehouse, it is probably not a medical device; if it is intended to help a disabled or physically challenged person do the same task that a fit person could, it is probably a medical device. You need to look carefully at your: intended use, indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions and claims, and compare them against the definition of a medical device in the EU Medical Device Regulation Art. #2 (1) and for the US #201(h)(1) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Once you understand if it is a medical device and why, it should become more routine to classify it and determine regulatory requirements. In summary: it is likely to be about the words you use in your marketing material rather than the physical device.

    There is a lot of EU MDCG and US FDA Guidance accessible on or via their websites.

    Neil



    ------------------------------
    Neil Armstrong FRAPS
    CEO MeddiQuest Limited
    Peterborough
    United Kingdom
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: medical furniture classification and requirements - US and EU

    Posted 29-Mar-2023 06:18

    Hello Maria,

    In addition to what has been provided and commented on, the US FDA has their email address you can send asking question whether a product is a medical device or not.  If you need something more formal there is the 513(g) classification process.  In the EU if you already have a Notified Body, certainly can inquire with them or your local Competent Authority.  The process for determining regulatory status of products not well established yet.  As Neil mentioned there are certainly plenty of guidance documents and can also get a more detailed review by an expert.



    ------------------------------
    Richard Vincins ASQ-CQA, MTOPRA, RAC
    Vice President Global Regulatory Affairs
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: medical furniture classification and requirements - US and EU

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 29-Mar-2023 06:54
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    For US, a 513(g) could be submitted to FDA for their feedback on device classification and its associated regulations. The 513(g) current standard fee is $5,961 and for a small business the fee is $2,980. It typically takes 60 days for FDA's response.

    For EU, could initiate communication with the notified body (since mentioned hold a CE Marked device), they may be able to provide helpful information or point you in the right direction for classification.




  • 7.  RE: medical furniture classification and requirements - US and EU

    Posted 29-Mar-2023 10:16

    Hi Maria

    From your description I can't tell if it functions as an assistive device.

    You'll need to write for yourself a clear description of the intended purposes, so you can show how it does or does not meet the various device definitions.

    For the US, if you haven't already, take a look at

    Devices:  https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/classify-your-medical-device/how-determine-if-your-product-medical-device

    Classification:  https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/overview-device-regulation/classify-your-medical-device

    Accessories:  https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/classify-your-medical-device/medical-device-accessories

    The thing might fall under 21 CFR 890.5050 or 21 CFR 890.3100.



    ------------------------------
    Anne LeBlanc
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: medical furniture classification and requirements - US and EU

    Posted 29-Mar-2023 11:44

    Hi Maria,

    to add some thoughts to the EU side of things: As far as I understand it, your exoskeleton currently is CE-marked as a medical device. The chair in itself does seem to have no specific medical purpose within the meaning of MDR Article 2(1) and therefore does not qualify as a medical device in itself.

    However, the MDR also applies to accessories for medical devices. The respective definition in the MDR states: "'accessory for a medical device' means an article which, whilst not being itself a medical device, is intended by its manufacturer to be used together with one or several particular medical device(s) to specifically enable the medical device(s) to be used in accordance with its/their intended purpose(s) or to specifically and directly assist the medical functionality of the medical device(s) in terms of its/their intended purpose(s);"

    So the question would be how you define the intended purpose of the chair and if it specifcally enables your medical device (which might be possible) or directly assists in its medical funcionality (which seems unlikely). In the end it very much depends on your definition and the things you would like to claim in marketing. Whatever your decision, it probably makes sense to discuss this with your Notified Body.

    If the chair qualifies as an accessory in the sense of the MDR, it would be classified in its own right according to the rules in MDR Annex VIII, probably resulting in class I. In consequence you could perform the conformity assessment procedure without participation of a Notified Body.

    That said: The devil is always in the details and much depends on the specifics of your situation.

    Best regards

    Christoph



    ------------------------------
    Christoph Kiesselbach
    Reutlingen
    Germany
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: medical furniture classification and requirements - US and EU

    Posted 29-Mar-2023 12:28

    Thank you all for your prompt and very helpful responses. I read all of them very attentively. Something that maybe was not clear for everybody from my first email is that the exoskeleton is definitely a medical device as it is intended for lower limbs impairments and indeed we have already FDA clearance and CE mark under MDR.

    Concerning the idea of asking for feedback to the FDA, I have already written to DICE and waiting for an answer. I initially discarded 513g because of the cost, but it is definitely a good option. Also I agree with Leonard concerning the need of applying some of the clauses of 60601-1, labeling, risk analysis and GMP (as far as applicable).

    I have also analyzed the mechanical chair and the assistive device CFR regulations, recommended by Anne, but I feel both of them are intended to help patients in movements and activities (e.g., crutches, walkers, etc.) while in our case the seat is used exclusively to make the device stand-up and sit down (see an image below as example). Ideally we would like to use it as well to transport the exoskeleton (without patient), which is the reason of the wheels, but we will make very clear that it should not be used to transport the exoskeleton with the patient inside. And if the wheels create additional burden (as they may create confusion with wheelchairs) I will probably recommend the R&D team to avoid them.

    We will claim the very minimum. The real purpose is to respond to a user need (today hard to find in the market) and not to promote a real medical device accessory. I see the intended use of the exoskeleton as walking, gait assistance, and physical rehabilitation, none of which is "enabled" or "assisted" by the chair. I am also happy to hear any recommendation you may have on wording to avoid to make clear that the chair is not a medical device nor an accessory.

    Thanks again for the fruitful discussion. I appreciate.



    ------------------------------
    Maria Ida Iacono
    Paris
    France
    ------------------------------