Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Mouthguard - MQC

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 04-Nov-2022 15:14
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    The FDA has Mouthguards as MQC product code Mouthguard (prescription). This is a Preamendment device, so it is not classified.

    There a total of 67 cleared 510k's for the MQC product code.

    Reviewing the 510k summaries, there are a total of 30 cleared for the materials used to build mouthguards. (material only, no device)

    There are a total of 23 cleared 510k's for mouthguard devices with additional pro codes which include over the counter (pro code OBR) and Rx mouthguards with a expanded indication (pro code OCO).   

    There are 14 cleared standalone mouthguard device (MQC) 510k's, and of those only 2 cleared 510k's in the last 7 years.   

    This seems like a very small number of companies cleared to manufacture mouthguards (at least Rx mouthguards). I know that most Rx mouthguards are produced in a dental lab, and there are very few dental labs listed under this product code. Hmmm. Something is not adding up here.

    For a medical device manufacturer wanting to produce mouthguards (MQC), is a 510k submission required?

    I would appreciate any feedback from those that have experience in this product space.

    Thank you.



  • 2.  RE: Mouthguard - MQC

    Posted 07-Nov-2022 18:44
    Edited by Corey Jaseph 07-Nov-2022 18:47
    There is also a dental one, also pre-amendment, code OBR. This one also requires a 510(k). Similarly, some anti-snoring devices look like mouth guards (code LRK), also requiring a 510(k).

    Depends on the intended use as to what the product code will be, but it looks like a lot of them do require a premarket submission.

    ------------------------------
    Corey Jaseph RAC
    Senior Research Analyst
    Wheatland CA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Mouthguard - MQC

    Posted 10-Nov-2022 01:09
    That does seem a bit vexing.
    There is this, just not sure how valid the source is...
    https://orthodonticresource.com/news/compliance-news/the-fdas-requirements-for-inhouse-processed-mouthguards/

    ------------------------------
    Jon Cook
    Sebastopol CA
    United States
    ------------------------------