I have experience where not of the primary stability batches were used in the clinic. I do not think that this is unusual for the FDA, as typically you are have already started your registration trials before you do the DOE work, etc. for you commercial/primary stability batches. These are the batches which reflect your commercial process and from which you will assign an expiry date. However, this is separate from bioequivalence issues, which you are also touching on.
Regards,
Rob
------------------------------
Robert Blanks RAC
VP, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance
[Ardelyx]
Auburndale MA
United States
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 05-Apr-2023 15:12
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: NDA Mod 3: primary (registration) stability batches
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hi Everyone,
Does anyone have experience wherein none of the Primary stability batches were used in the clinic - i.e. for phase 2 or phase 3 clinical trial material?
-- additionally, the clinical trial batch (site 1) was manufactured at a different site than the primary stability batches (site 2).
Appreciate your thoughts on how to justify the lack of any clinical experience with primary stability batches and what comparative data would be sufficient?
It is for oral dosage form, BCS 1.
I ask because FDA/regulators more recently are interested for clinically relevant specs (release and expiry/shelf-life).
Thanks