Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Nitrosamine risk assessment for phase 2 asset

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 28-Nov-2023 14:49
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    What level of Nitrosamine risk assessment is required for an asset moving to phase 2? Recently, with end of phase 1 meeting , FDA said under additional comments that drug product should be evaluated for the potential presence of nitrosamine impurities and, if present, controlled at acceptable levels. It is not clear if the RA is expected to be summitted with phase 2 protocol. Does anyone has any experience with this?



  • 2.  RE: Nitrosamine risk assessment for phase 2 asset

    Posted 29-Nov-2023 05:14

    Hello,

    My experience with different regulatory agencies is that when they have a comment like that you need to provide them the information as part of the study where the comment was issued. This would mean that you have to respond to FDA request and provide the additional information within the phase 2 study. I recommend that you contact the manufacturer as they may already have this data and can provide it to you. 

    Good luck with your study.

    Olga



    ------------------------------
    Olga Peycheva
    Regulatory and Study Start Up Specialist (Clinical trials)
    Solutions OP Ltd
    https://solutionsop.co.uk/
    United Kingdom
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Nitrosamine risk assessment for phase 2 asset

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 01-Dec-2023 09:27
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Hi Olga,

    This was not a direct request from FDA. Generally FDA with EOP1 , under 'Additional comments' provides some development related advice. This specific comment was not related to any question sponsor asked .  I am trying to understand what level of RA would be need, if any in an asset moving to phase 2 when the mfg  process is yet not locked in. 

    Thank you for your response.




  • 4.  RE: Nitrosamine risk assessment for phase 2 asset

    Posted 29-Nov-2023 09:29

    This is a requirement for the NDA. There are two FDA guidances on this - one for drug substances and one for human drugs.  Both include a section on recommended timing. 



    ------------------------------
    Tom Stothoff
    Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs CMC
    Chicago
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Nitrosamine risk assessment for phase 2 asset

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 29-Nov-2023 14:50
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Agree, this is an overall recommendation at earlier stage of development so that the sponsor understands that these studies need to be completed and be ready to submit along with the NDA! 




  • 6.  RE: Nitrosamine risk assessment for phase 2 asset

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 01-Dec-2023 09:27
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    HI Tom,

    So if I understand there is no requirement to provide any risk assessment for phase 2 asset to provide nitrosamine RA? The requirements only applicable to NDA?




  • 7.  RE: Nitrosamine risk assessment for phase 2 asset

    Posted 01-Dec-2023 09:52

    That's how I interpret the guidelines. Our program completed Phase 2 last year and Phase 3 is now ongoing and we haven't submitted anything to the IND yet and having the assessments completed in time for NDA filing.



    ------------------------------
    Tom Stothoff
    Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs CMC
    Chicago
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Nitrosamine risk assessment for phase 2 asset

    Posted 04-Dec-2023 12:44

    I agree with Tom's assessment. FDA makes these kinds of statements earlier in development as a reminder to make sure it gets done for the NDA/BLA. Apparently there are companies out there that still don't realize this stuff, so it becomes boilerplate language. We recently got one that reminded us that child-proof packaging is required.



    ------------------------------
    Rachel Thornton
    Director
    UCB, Inc.
    Smyrna GA
    United States
    ------------------------------