Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Timing of Mass Balance (ADME) Studies

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 25-Jul-2022 09:39
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Hi!

    The recently-released FDA draft guidance, "Clinical Pharmacology Considerations for Human Radiolabeled Mass Balance Studies" details that mass balance studies should be conducted early in drug development, at the latest before initiating any late-phase clinical trials. I interpret this to mean that mass balance studies should be initiated before Phase 3 trials.

    However, I've been told that FDA likes to see the safety of major human circulatory metabolites be established before the start of any large clinical study, and in some cases a Phase 2b study may qualify as a large study.

    May I ask what constitutes a "large study" for a Phase 2b? Is enrolling over 100 subjects considered large?

    Appreciate any help!! Thank you!!


  • 2.  RE: Timing of Mass Balance (ADME) Studies

    Posted 26-Jul-2022 08:34
    There are no absolutes that can be used to answer your questions. My philosophy is that the more facts you have and the earlier in the development process you have them the better your development program will be and the safer subjects in your clinical trials will be. 100 exposed subjects could be considered a "large" Phase 2b study.  However, there are many factors that go into the decision on when to conduct a mass balance study. Generally, they are expensive and can be technically challenging from labeling the compound to identifying metabolites. If there is the potential to require qualification of one or metabolites, the earlier that is done the better.

    ------------------------------
    Glen Park PharmD
    Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance
    New York NY
    United States
    ------------------------------