Put simply, yes, a medical device placed on the UK market, whether in Great Britain (England, Wales, Scotland) or in Northern Ireland, is, per the UK MDR, expected to comply with (by "taking account of") the generally acknowledged state of the art (GASOTA). This remains true regardless of whether the device is European CE marked [CE marking is not required (yet is accepted) for Great Britain]. This is because the UK MDR, for Great Britain, incorporates by reference the essential requirements of the MDD, AIMDD, and IVDD (93/42/EEC, 90/385/EEC, or 98/79/EC) and because, for Northern Ireland, requires conformity with the EU MDR or IVDR, all of which require GASOTA to be accounted for. Note that the incorporation by reference of the MDD/AIMDD/IVDD essential requirements into the UK MDR for Great Britain stands regardless of their outgoing/sunsetting status in Europe's Union.
Much has been said before in the Forum about what is fundamentally meant by GASOTA, so I won't go into detail on that again here unless requested. But I will say that the normative text of ISO 13485:2016 and EN ISO 13485:2016+A11:2021 are identical. Thus, for purposes of Great Britain GASOTA, I don't believe it matters which of those are applied, whereas for Northern Ireland the EN version would be expected.
------------------------------
Kevin Randall, ASQ CQA, RAC (Europe, U.S., Canada)
Principal Consultant
Ridgway, CO
United States
© Copyright 2023 by ComplianceAcuity, Inc. All rights reserved.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 03-Nov-2023 03:21
From: Ronald Boumans
Subject: UK Designated Standards
Standards are not mandatory. However, notified bodies and UK approved bodies will expect to see references to certain standards. Standards are continuously updated. Some time later those updated standards may become harmonized. When referring to a standard that is also harmonized, a manufacturer has two options. They can refer to the harmonized standard and the certification body must accept that. Or they refer to the updated version, stating that they consider that more state of the art then the harmonized version. They have to create a justification listing the exact requirements that are met by that standard, but often it is possible to more or less copy that from the harmonized standard. In my experience, certification bodies accept this approach.
Especially in cases of a significant update in a standard, it can be recommended to go for the latest version. This may prevent having to create additional evidence later.
------------------------------
Ronald Boumans
MDR Expert
Super PRRC
Netherlands
Original Message:
Sent: 01-Nov-2023 21:12
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: UK Designated Standards
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hi all,
I know that there have been preior discussions on state of the art standards, but couldn't find something that that would address my problem.
We are class I under the current UK MDR and are not planning on going into in EU anytime soon. Since the UK Designated Standard list has not been updated since 2021, and our consultants / ISO13485 auditors have different opinions, I thought I'd raise the question here. Should we be compliant and state compliance with the SOA (harmonised) standards, or with the versions included in the list of the designated standards? Should we follow ISO 13485:2016 or should we include EN ISO 13485:2016/A11:2021? Even if the amndment is not applicable to us?
Thanks in advance for your input!