Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Log in
Toggle navigation
Search Options
Log in
Home
Library
Directory
List of Contributions
×
Richard Vincins, ASQ-CQA, MTOPRA, RAC
Contact Details
United States
×
Enter Password
Enter Password
Confirm Password
Boston Chapter
Profile
Volunteer Profile
Connections
Contacts
Contributions
Achievements
List of Contributions
Contributions
1 to 5 of 18 total
search criteria =
ALL
RE: Distributor name on labels
Posted By
Richard Vincins
21-Jan-2024 00:34
Found In
Egroup:
Boston Chapter
\
view thread
Anoop, In most countries, there is no requirement to include the distributor name on the product labelling. Inclusion of a distributor name on the labelling is really a business decision between the two companies. However, make sure the labelling is clear who is the Manufacturer because if another ...
RE: Software in medical device - what should be included in 510K?
Posted By
Richard Vincins
23-Nov-2022 01:42
Found In
Egroup:
Boston Chapter
\
view thread
Hello Haewon, It really depends on what these accessories are doing, functionality, and how they may assist in the main application in its functionality. If you are speaking about the Software as Medical Device (SaMD) and these accessories are also only software, then it does depend on function and ...
RE: Registration of studies (PMCF, clinical)
Posted By
Richard Vincins
13-Jan-2022 08:43
Found In
Egroup:
Boston Chapter
\
view thread
Hi Lukas, Yep, I have seen that before too - peer-reviewed journals need to have their own traceability. An "internal" study that a company says, 'yep the data is good!' does not really go well with peer-reviewer journals haha. The issue is a PMCF is not a formal study outside of the company. The ...
RE: Registration of studies (PMCF, clinical)
Posted By
Richard Vincins
12-Jan-2022 03:19
Found In
Egroup:
Boston Chapter
\
view thread
Hello Lukas, The question raised with registering a PMCF in a clinical study database like eudraCT is PMCF is a "study" with already approved medical device - the device is CE Marked. Therefore it is completely acceptable to be used for humans/patients. As far as I know, there is no requirement ...
RE: Manufacturer protection
Posted By
Richard Vincins
06-Jul-2021 03:34
Found In
Egroup:
Boston Chapter
\
view thread
Hello Lukas, You can not really choose between 510(k), De Novo or PMA, it all depends on the classification of the device: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPCD/classification.cfm. Because you may think the device is a higher risk or higher classification, does not necessarily ...
«
1
2
3
4
»
Copyright 2023. All rights reserved.
Powered by Higher Logic
×
Community Tags
Tags for Boston Chapter community.
Add a tag
Chapter Tags
BostonChapter
Sector
Medical Devices
Professional Interests
Advertising, Promotion and Labeling
Audit/FDA Inspection
FDA Meeting and Communication Strategy
Clinical Trials
Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC)
Compliance
Product Lifecycle
Regulatory Intelligence/Policy
Engagement
TipTuesday
x
User Tags may not contain the following characters: @ # $ & :