Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

  • 1.  Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 31-Aug-2021 08:17
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Dear Community,

    A question on the Regulatory Impact of removal of a laboratory conducting exploratory measure in a Phase 3 clinical trial.

    If down the product development, there is removal of such a laboratory from the clinical protocol/ICF, does it warrant updates to the 1572(US)/CIF(ex-US) in the INC/CTA? What is the regulatory impact for such a change?

    Thank you


  • 2.  RE: Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    Posted 31-Aug-2021 12:25
    Hello,

    The short answer is yes.  Depending upon whether there was a GCP violation determines additional steps and regulatory impact.  I'd also review the vendor contract.

    Best,
    Gretchen

    ------------------------------
    Gretchen Upton
    RAC, CQA, CCRP
    QA/RA consultant
    San Antonio, TX
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 01-Sep-2021 10:09
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Hi Grechen,

    Thank you for the response.

    To clarify - the lab currently listed on the ICF will be either deleted or replaced by a different vendor. If the tetsing were to happen it will be after 2 years (after study completion). Would the two such scenarios require the updates to be made to 1572 upon study completion. 

    Best Regards


  • 4.  RE: Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    Posted 01-Sep-2021 11:15
    Gotcha.  In that case, I would notify the sponsor and update clinical documents.  However, if you are also the sponsor, you could update the protocol via an amendment.


    ------------------------------
    Gretchen Upton
    RAC, CQA, CCRP
    QA/RA consultant
    San Antonio, TX
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    Posted 01-Sep-2021 08:58
    By "removal" you mean that the lab just isn't doing the contracted work any more? I'm not sure you would have to re-do all of the 1572s to take that lab off - the list of laboratories, facilities, etc should be comprehensive and broad, so taking a lab off that list would not seem to warrant a new 1572.

    ------------------------------
    Beth Weinberg
    Regulatory Affairs Lead
    Carmel IN
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 01-Sep-2021 10:09
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Hi Beth, 

    Thank you for the response, by removal I meant that incase the testing either will not be conducted (since a exploratory measure) or done by a different vendor. Additional info -- the testing most likely will happen at least 2 years later which is after study completion.

    Best Regards


  • 7.  RE: Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    Posted 01-Sep-2021 10:49
    Not sure I really understand your question since the potential scenario is after the current study is completed.  

    However, if you plan to use a different laboratory to evaluate the samples collected under the clinical protocol that is completed, that is a different scenario.  Is this the question?

    Best,

    Dar

    ------------------------------
    Darlene Rosario MBA, RAC
    Principle Consultant
    Ventura CA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 01-Sep-2021 10:09
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Most importantly, did you file this laboratory conducting an exploratory measure in your IND/CTA? If yes then has an impact. My question is who advised you to list all these details in your IND or the protocol? Generally we don't go into naming all the laboratories doing all kinds of exploratory measures in the IND. You just describe the measure or testing procedure not who conducts this test etc......


  • 9.  RE: Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    Posted 01-Sep-2021 10:52
    Edited by Dipika Tuteja Shringarpure 01-Sep-2021 11:43
    Currently, if the laboratory is not listed in the Protocol, only the exploratory measure is listed in protocol; and if the laboratory  is mentioned only in the ICF it will also have to be included in the  CIF/1572? 

    A question in response to one of the input provided here -- Would having the lab address in ICF be considered filing to IND as per this statement  "did you file this laboratory conducting an exploratory measure in your IND/CTA"?





  • 10.  RE: Regulatory Impact - Removal of a Lab from 1572/CIF

    Posted 01-Sep-2021 16:28
    Generally speaking you don't need to specify what labs are conducting the actual testing (I am only talking about clinical and non clinical testing aspects, not an overall study conduct say a nonclinical study by a an organization). I am specifically talking about labs that do testing say for 'inclusion criteria' like ALK positive tumor you don't need to specify the name and address of the labs in the regulatory documents submitted to the FDA, these details should go into Study master file which should be kept on site. Hope this is clear!

    Your question: "Currently, if the laboratory is not listed in the Protocol, only the exploratory measure is listed in protocol; and if the laboratory  is mentioned only in the ICF it will also have to be included in the  CIF/1572?" Absolutely NOT necessary.

    "A question in response to one of the input provided here -- Would having the lab address in ICF be considered filing to IND as per this statement  "did you file this laboratory conducting an exploratory measure in your IND/CTA"?" 
    Absolutely NO. In the future, please don't include the details such as lab address, name etc on the regulatory documents, they should be kept on site in trial Master file or some other internal documents for any onsite potential GCP inspections.

    Hope this is helpful



    ------------------------------
    GRSAOnline
    ------------------------------