I have heard from some clients that one NB is great and responsive and the same NB is totally unresponsive. So, it really depends on the project, the file manager, and the client, the NB backlog, and sometimes the size of the company as noted in some of the posts. I think many companies will have different experiences with the same NB's. I think if one company has a great experience with a certain contact at an NB I would ask for that contact info and pass it on would be really helpful for others as that will be the "golden ticket" to make life easier in the process. Knowing the right people at the NBs certainly does make the process easier, especially since I have worked at 3 different ones over 27 years (with breaks in between).
------------------------------
Leonard (Leo) Eisner, P.E.
The "IEC 60601 Guy"
Principal Consultant, Eisner Safety Consultants
Phone: (503) 244-6151
Mobile: (503) 709-8328
Email:
Leo@EisnerSafety.comWebsite:
www.EisnerSafety.com------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 11-Jun-2021 13:18
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: NB responsiveness - opinions?
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hello all,
We are planning on transitioning away from our current NB and 13485 auditor while we transition to MDR. This is for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which is general unresponsiveness. While we understand that MDR has placed a huge burden on the NBs, this has been ongoing for years.
Have you found some NBs more responsive and helpful than others? Particularly, have you had good success with BSI, Intertek, or TUV SUD?
I apologize if this is not allowed.
Thank you!