Thank you, Amy, Dan and Richard for your replies.
I understand each perspective. However, I tend to agree with Dan and Amy for all the reason stated.
Article 120(3) stating that it is with a valid MDD / AIMD certificate that a device can continue to be placed on the market "
provided that it continues to comply with either of those directives. . . " does include the labeling requirements as the only explicit association of the requirements for Article 18, Implant cards, is with Annex I, Chapter III - Requirements Regarding Information Supplied with the Device, 4 (aa). Neither Article 18, nor implant cards is associated/mentioned in the Article 120, Transitional provisions.
The purpose of the implant card is to make information available to the particular patient who has been implanted with the device. This purpose does not necessarily support an association with postmarket surveillance, vigilance, etc.
We will inquire with our NB about implementing an implant card sooner than later. If it is considered to be a significant change to our devices (as I anticipate that I might be), it will wait until our planned transition.
Thank you.
------------------------------
Melissa M. Traylor
Regulatory Affairs
FzioMed, Inc.
San Luis Obispo, California
USA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 14-Oct-2019 11:57
From: Amy McKinney
Subject: Implant Card
I agree with Dan based on the wording in Article 120(3) stating that it is with a valid MDD / AIMD certificate that a device can continue to be placed on the market "provided that it continues to comply with either of those directives. . . " I believe this includes the labeling requirements of those directives since the following sentence states that the requirements of PMS, market surveillance, vigilance, registration of economic operators and of devices shall apply in place of the corresponding requirements in those directives. It doesn't say that any of the labeling requirements are to be replaced by the labeling requirements of the MDR.
Amy
------------------------------
Amy McKinney RAC
Sr Manager, Regulatory Affairs, Interventional Oncology
Fulshear TX
United States
Original Message:
Sent: 10-Oct-2019 11:46
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: Implant Card
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Per (EU) 2017/745, Article 18, the information provided in the implant card is for the purposes of making it available to the particular patient who has been implanted with the device, by means that allow rapid access to that information.
Article 120, Transitional provisions, (3) indicate that requirements of the Regulation relating to postmarket surveillance, vigilance, etc. apply as of 26 May 2020.
For implantable products, when must an implant card be included with the product? Upon CE mark of the device under MDR; or, in accordance with Article 120, Transitional provisions, by May 2020? Is the implant card considered to be labeling? If a device that will require an implant card will not transition until May 2024, how will implementation of the card be reviewed by the NB before that time?