I'm so excited for you! What an excellent opportunity.
Echoing Julie's wise comments - working against a retainer is prudent. Otherwise you place yourself at risk for late payment, non payment, etc, which can cost you time, money, relationships, and lost opportunities.
A retainer protects both you (from not being paid for services rendered) and also the start-up. In some companies, project management may not track billed hours closely enough to avoid overages which can have bad impacts on budget. Retainers are an excellent built in control to protect both parties and allow them to focus on the work at hand.
Track your time per task, and determine what your billable increments will be. This can vary - I've seen people bill hourly, I've seen smaller increments used. Smaller increments (15 min or 10 min) are harder when getting started tracking time, but are useful in two ways.
First, they let the start-up more clearly see what was done and often ease them approving work done. Second, they help you learn how long it takes you to perform certain activities (researching one predicate, checking on one standard, creating a template, populating a template, etc...) This helps you in the future when you are scheduling and planning your own utilization for the next contract. No two projects will ever be the same, but having a ballpark idea of time required by tasks helps.
There are also hours which are not billable, so it's important to track those as well and get a sense of your billable/non-billable ratio. Your billable hours need to be at a rate which allows you to do the work, even considering the non billable time you're putting in.
(If you choose to not work against retainer, one possibility is to include a built in discount for prompt payment. If they'd pay X$ for payment within 30 days, they'd pay 5% less for payment within a shorter time. Also, consider what your late payment policy is - is there a surcharge? How much? At what point will you cease work until payment commences? All said, it's simplest and safest for all to work against retainer.)
Joanne
------------------------------
Joanne Pelaschier RAC,PHD
Sr. Regulatory Specialist
Milpitas CA
United States
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 30-May-2017 16:04
From: Julie Omohundro
Subject: How do you structure a consulting contract?
I bill an hourly rate and specify a maximum number of hours I can bill under the agreement without approval from the client to bill more.
I ask for a retainer and bill against the retainer. With a startup, be sure the retainer high enough that you will feel reasonably satisfied if that's the only amount you ever receive. Keep the retainer low enough that the startup will pay it by writing a narrow scope of work. I agree a regulatory strategy is a good place to start.
Even the time required to do a regulatory strategy can vary a good bit. It might not take much time to confirm that it really is a "straightforward 510(k)" and lay out the associated path. On the other hand, if you find, for example, that there are two potential predicates, neither of which is a slam dunk for an SE determination, meaning that the device might have to go De novo instead, that's really three regulatory paths you will have to investigate, along with advantages and disadvantages of each one over the other two.
------------------------------
Julie Omohundro, ex-RAC (US, GS), still an MBA
Principal Consultant
Class Three, LLC
Durham, North Carolina, USA
919-544-3366 (T)
434-964-1614 (C)
julie@class3devices.com
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 29-May-2017 17:51
From: An Dao
Subject: How do you structure a consulting contract?
Hi all,
I'm interested in branching into regulatory consulting and have landed a first potential consulting client - a startup working on software-based diagnostic tools. The next step in our conversation is drawing up a contract, and I'd like to get a sense of the best practices in structuring a consulting contract. In particular, do you tend to use hours for billing, or draw up contracts based on particular milestones? If you measure in hours, do you agree ahead of time how long a project should take, and how do you handle unexpected delays? If milestones, what milestones might be appropriate for an early stage startup with a product, but which hasn't yet developed a regulatory strategy?
Any other do's and don'ts and lessons learned would be appreciated!
------------------------------
An Dao
Head of Regulatory Affairs
Houston, TX
------------------------------