Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Non-medical use of device with medical function

  • 1.  Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 18-Dec-2012 04:31

    Following the recent court case in Europe between Brain Products and BioSemi VOF concerning the use of a device that meets the definition of a medical device as per the MDD, but is not intended for a medical purpose, I would appreciate input from colleagues on a similar "scenario" opposite the FDA. By way of example, I will refer to a SPO2 (pulse oximeter) device. On the one hand, the FDA defines a pulse oximeter as a Class II device that requires a 510(k); while on the other hand SPO2 devices can be bought via Amazon as non-medical devices, without 510(k) clearance.

    Question: can a device that is defined by FDA as falling within the category of a medical device due to its medical function, "become" a non-medical device by changing the labeling and intended use to that of non-medical?

    Also, does it matter if the non-medical device is sold as stand-alone, or is part of a multi-function device that has an "overall" medical purpose, i.e. does a non-medical function "inherit" the medical intended use of a device that has both medical and non-medical functions?

    -------------------------------------------
    Asher Kassel
    Lifewatch Technologies Ltd.
    Rehovot
    Israel
    -------------------------------------------


  • 2.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 18-Dec-2012 09:33
    Hi Asher,

    Are you certain the ones sold through Amazon do not have 510(k) clearance? Maybe they have 510(k) clearance and were granted OTC status, so they can be sold DTC?

    -------------------------------------------
    Corey Jaseph
    Regulatory Affairs Manager
    Ultradent Products, Inc.
    South Jordan UT
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 3.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 18-Dec-2012 09:40

    Masimo just launched the exact pulse oximeter via Amazon without a 510(k).  Indeed, their website, in my humble opinion, while claiming the product is for non-medical uses, makes claims that render the product a medical device that should be subject to a 510(k).

    See:  http://www.ispo2.com/common-uses.aspx

    This shows clearly, in my view, that a key concern with Asher's question will be whether the labeling claims made for such a product truly are outside the medical device definition in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.  I think Masimo's are not.  Another device might be able to have label, labeling and promotional claims that truly are "non-medical" in nature such as those discussed in the July 2011 draft guidance on medical applications.

    ______________________________________________
    Michael A. Swit, Esq.
    Special Counsel, FDA Law Practice
    Duane Morris LLP
    750 B Street, Suite 2900
    San Diego, CA 92101-4681
    P: +1 619 744 2215
    F: +1 619 923 2648
    C +1 760 815 4762
    maswit@duanemorris.com

    Note: all postings by me on this forum represent my personal views and are not necessarily those of my clients or my law firm. Further, my comments are not intended as legal advice but as the sharing of general knowledge and do not create an attorney-client relationship with any reader.

    Please follow me on LinkedIN and Twitter:
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelswit
    https://twitter.com/FDACounsel

    -------------------------------------------








  • 4.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 19-Dec-2012 06:38
    This is certainly an interesting discussion!

    While it is sometimes true that devices available on the internet are misbranded, after looking over information specific to Masimo I conclude that they know exactly what they are doing.

    They are in the news with their DTC marketing of a consumer oximeter:
    http://www.fiercemedicaldevices.com/story/masimo-launches-iphone-compatible-pulse-oximeter/2012-12-13

    and furthermore have clearance for many oximeters. I found 65 for product code DQA.

    I note on the site that Michael posted that Masimo states in large print:
    "Pulse Oximeters in Sports and Aviation" and elsewhere "For Sports and Aviation Use."

    Evidently by singling out non-medical target populations they are able to market this particular one without clearance. It seems that they have cleared so many of their other products, why wouldn't they clear this one?

    As for the other oximeters on Amazon, they appear to be cleared, although the marketing site does say that they are "approved" [sic].

    -------------------------------------------
    Jean Bigoney PHD
    Managing Member
    Nu Device Consulting LLC
    Newport NH
    United States
    -------------------------------------------












  • 5.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 11:11
    Here is the list of videos for Oximeters. Please watch the first one (Phone Oximeter) HERE.  
    It may be interesting, funny or even hilarious. It is your call.  

    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Regulatory Doctor, Coach, Mentor, and Consultant
    www.GlobalComplianceSeminar.Com
    Riner VA
    United States
    -----------------------------------------------------------------






  • 6.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 21-Jan-2013 15:39
    This can be intrepreted both ways, but the FDA does say this on Warning Letters:

    These products are devices within the meaning of section 201 (h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. § 321(h), because they are intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or to affect the structure or any function of the body.
    -------------------------------------------
    Carroll Hoyle
    Sr. Global Regulatory Affairs
    BSN Medical
    Rutherford College NC
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 7.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 19-Dec-2012 23:24
    Folks:

    Two more points:

    1.  On Shree's point, I beg to differ.  The key element of the medical device definition is "intended use."  Thus, you can take a heart rate monitor and label it solely to keep track of heart rate (as the Polar people do) for athletes that want to maximize their fitness by staying in the right heart rate "zone."  In my view, that's not a medical device claim even though you are using technology that just as well could be used for monitoring heart rate for medical reasons.  Same for pulse oximeters.  I could see similar athletic uses.

    2.  As to Jean's point, I don't think the Masimo people have succeeded, at least based on their current website statements.  While I think, as discussed in item #1, there are non-medical uses of a pulse oximeter, I invite folks to comment whehter the following statements made by Masimo are non-medical.  These all can be found at the following website maintained by Masimo: 
    http://ispo2.com/common-uses.aspx.

    Are these "non-medical"?  Let's take a poll.  What do you folks think?

    Michael


    Excerpt from Masimo's website for its "non-medical" device:

    Common Uses

    Pulse Oximeters in Sports and Aviation

    High Altitude Sport Participants

    High elevation sports enthusiasts such as hikers and climbers may find the iSpO2 a useful tool to identify situations in which oxygen saturation is declining at higher elevations. Declining oxygen saturation is commonly associated with several conditions at high elevations, such as HAPE (high altitude pulmonary edema) and other forms of altitude sickness. For more information, visit:

    Pilots

    According to Pilotfriend:

    "Unfortunately, the nature of hypoxia makes you, the pilot, the poorest judge of when you are its victim. The first symptoms of oxygen deficiency are misleadingly pleasant, resembling mild intoxication from alcohol. Because oxygen starvation strikes first at the brain, your higher faculties are dulled. Your normal self-critical ability is out of order. Your mind no longer functions properly; your hands and feet become clumsy without being aware of it; you may feel drowsy, languid, and nonchalant; you have a false sense of security; and, the last thing in the world you think you need is oxygen.1"

    Brent Blue, MD, of www.aeromedix.com, says the following about hypoxia:

    "Lack of oxygen is the greatest single danger to man at high altitudes due to its immediate and critical effects. The shortage of oxygen in the human body is called hypoxia, which means that the body is not getting enough oxygen to maintain normal body functions. When a pilot inhales air at high altitudes, due to the decreased barometric pressure, the amount of oxygen inhaled with every breath is less than at sea level. Thus, the number of oxygen molecules that is available to be transported through the lung tissue into the blood stream is reduced. When the level of oxygen in the blood is low, the brain and other tissues are adversely affected.2

    The Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) require oxygen to be used if flying above 12,500 feet MSL (Mean Sea Level) for 30 or more minutes and at all times above 14,000 feet MSL. However, many pilots and passengers experience hypoxia at lower altitudes, especially at night."

    Recommendations from Dr. Blue:

    1. Always use oxygen if there is any sensation of hypoxia such as euphoria, visual changes, headache, dizziness, nausea, anxiety, panic, or confusion.
    2. Pilots should use oxygen when their saturation drops five percentage points below their home field saturation, and must use oxygen if their saturation drops 10 points below their home field sat. For instance, if your home field saturation is 97%, you should use oxygen at 92% and must use oxygen at 87%. Refer to oxygen instructions for safe use.

    The only practical way to know if you are hypoxic or in danger of becoming hypoxic is to use a pulse oximeter. Pulse oximeters measure the saturation of oxygen in the blood stream. Ninety-five to 100% is normal at sea level.





    ______________________________________________
    Michael A. Swit, Esq.
    Special Counsel, FDA Law Practice
    Duane Morris LLP
    750 B Street, Suite 2900
    San Diego, CA 92101-4681
    P: +1 619 744 2215
    F: +1 619 923 2648
    C +1 760 815 4762
    maswit@duanemorris.com

    Note: all postings by me on this forum represent my personal views and are not necessarily those of my clients or my law firm. Further, my comments are not intended as legal advice but as the sharing of general knowledge and do not create an attorney-client relationship with any reader.

    Please follow me on LinkedIN and Twitter:
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelswit
    https://twitter.com/FDACounsel

    -------------------------------------------








  • 8.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 08:48
    Those are definitely medical claims as they are intended to diagnose a disease or medical condition. Additionally, if the devices fail to work properly they could result in serious injury to the patient or death.

    As the company has cleared many pulse oximeters, these have probably been cleared, but not necessarily for these claims.

    -------------------------------------------
    Judy Burton
    Advena USA
    Dallas TX
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 9.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 09:19
    Not surprisingly I vote "non-medical," but I'll try to frame my answer in a logical if not legal fashion.

    While Masimo does describe a condition of hypoxia, I believe that where the definition of a medical device according to the FDA is not met is contained in this phrase from the FDA website:

    "intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals."

    If the hypoxia is caused by high altitude or engaging in sports activity, then it is not a "condition." Strenuous exercise can drive up blood pressure temporariliy, but it does not result in the condition of hypertension. A neighbor's dog barking at 3AM can disrupt sleep, but that does not mean the person has a sleep disorder. I'm reminded of the old joke:

    Doctor: Does it hurt when you do this? Patient: Yes. Doctor: Well, don't do that.

    About the best analogy I can think of where there is a medical and non-medical use of the same technology is infrared heating lamps. There are medical devices which use this technology and claim specific beneficial effects for the relief of pain. There are non-medical devices which use essentially the same technology but simply claim they make you feel warm. Feeling cold can have non-medical as well as medical causes. If a manufacturer of an IR lamp without 510(k) clearance had statements on their website to the effect that their product will mitigate the symptoms of infection, I would consider that misbranding. However they are free to go on about the beneficial effects of warmth without fear of an FDA warning letter.

    By the same token there are medical causes of hypoxia which Masimo does not address on their website. The message I get from their text is that if you are going to voluntarily travel to high altitude and notice that your blood oxygen enters a danger zone, do something about it. Or, as the doctor in the joke would say, "well don't do that."


    -------------------------------------------
    Jean Bigoney PHD
    Managing Member
    Nu Device Consulting LLC
    Newport NH
    United States
    -------------------------------------------




     Are these "non-medical"?  Let's take a poll.  What do you folks think?

    Michael


    Excerpt from Masimo's website for its "non-medical" device:
     


  • 10.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 09:59
    In response to Michael's poll, I think they have been very careful to word the information as to not state that their product is intended to diagnose either of these conditions.  The fact that they direct you to medical informaiton about the conditions is purely educational in nature.  I vote for them being slightly over the line in the "safe zone".

    Sarah

    -------------------------------------------
    Sarah Powell RAC,FRAPS
    Executive Director, Regulatory Affairs and Writing Services
    Liquent
    -------------------------------------------








  • 11.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 12:01

    I agree with Michael. I can see why pulse oximeters could be marketed for sports use and not as a medical device. However, the common uses website uses examples that clearly promote the pulse oximeter for medical purposes. It sounds like promotion of this device may require a delicate balance. Hypoxia is a condition that can require treatment. I don't think you would call it a disease, but there may be some delicate balancing required to promote how to use a pulse oximeter for sports use without promoting it obviously for medical uses such as hypoxia, etc.
    -------------------------------------------
    Justin Baker PHD
    Custom Orthopaedic Solutions
    Cleveland OH
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 12.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 14:20
    Thank you John Venn for your diagram. Fascinating topic. Is hypoxia a disease? FDA does not regulate every possible use. When a football player takes in extra oxygen on the sideline, is this a medical use? Emphysema, yes. There are occupational and athletic uses for gases that could be regulated as drugs when they are for a medical use. There are ventilators (air pumps) for confined spaces, occupational, manholes. Scuba gear is probably regulated or certified somehow, and has common or similar equipment to medical applications for anesthesiology. That snorkle floating in the pool, toy, athletic or medical? Take a deep breath. Use something that actually works if you need assistance. It is hard to say that altitude "sickness" is non-medical, but I would vote for FDA's enforcement discretion on this one.

    -------------------------------------------
    Kenneth Kasper PHD
    Executive Director, QA/RA
    ARK Diagnostics, Inc.
    Fremont CA
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 13.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 15:36

    Under the circumstances, my recommended approaches are based on "totality."

    1. Device Definitions (applicable and/or relevant statutes and regulations)
    2. Intended Use
    3. Claims including words and/or acts
    4. When it is used and how it is used
    5. Agency's interpretation
    6. Other cases: gyms having many exercise/fitness equipment having digital cardiomonitors, etc. 

    Per 21 CFR 870.2700 and FDA's product definition, Oximeter is defined "Solely for use with sporting and aviation activities. Intended to monitor heart rate during excercise."  For further info, please click HERE.  

    Product Code: OCH
    Class II
    NOT third party review eligible

    All things considered, at this point in time, the company should have had their 510(k)(s) under review.  

    I hope they do.  

    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Regulatory Doctor, Coach, Mentor, and Consultant
    www.GlobalComplianceSeminar.Com
    Riner VA
    United States
    ------------------------------------------------------------------








  • 14.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 19:38
    Folks:

    Dr. Lim raises an additional variable.  Here, it seems that, with respect to one product code, FDA has lumped an oximeter for sports and aviation use into a classification (II) that would usually require a 510(k).  Logically, this implies that FDA regards the athletic and aviation uses as medical device uses.  However, just because FDA calls it a medical device does not end the inquiry (although it clearly makes the climb an uphill battle).

    I think an argument exists that, if done properly, a pure "athletic" use for an oximeter should fall outside the medical device definition.  However, at least with Masimo, I think they included too many references to true medical conditions on their website for them to escape having FDA be able to conclude that the device is a medical device.  If I were advising them, I would have pared down what they said.

    As to the aviation use, if I understand it correctly, an oximeter is used only to track -- diagnose -- the potential for hypoxia, which is also clearly a medical condition.  Thus, I am not sure how Masimo can talk about pilots/aviation without at least indirectly rendering the product a medical device. 

    If there is a non-medical use in aviation for an oximeter, Masimo should stick to that and avoid hypoxia.

    Of course, as we all know, even if we assume that Masimo's product does not comply with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, FDA has tremendous discretion as to whether to do anything about that situation. 

    Best,
    Michael


    ______________________________________________
    Michael A. Swit, Esq.
    Special Counsel, FDA Law Practice
    Duane Morris LLP
    750 B Street, Suite 2900
    San Diego, CA 92101-4681
    P: +1 619 744 2215
    F: +1 619 923 2648
    C +1 760 815 4762
    maswit@duanemorris.com

    Note: all postings by me on this forum represent my personal views and are not necessarily those of my clients or my law firm. Further, my comments are not intended as legal advice but as the sharing of general knowledge and do not create an attorney-client relationship with any reader.

    Please follow me on LinkedIN and Twitter:
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelswit
    https://twitter.com/FDACounsel

    -------------------------------------------








  • 15.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 20:07


    Actually there are five product codes associated with oximeters, DQA, MUD, NLF, NMD, and OCH. I have not combed through the sumamries to determine what differentiates them.

    Based on Masimo's 65 prior submissions in product code DQA I would presume that this particular oximeter is also in product code DQA.

    I'm having a difficult time believing that after 67 successful submissions (two were not for DQA), Masimo would avoid obtaining clearance for a consumer product and yet publicize the product launch.

    Incidentally the FDA has issued a statement regarding the difference between medical and non-medical versions of oximeters. It appears to come down to the labeling.
    http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/briefing/2005-4141b1_03_Section%202-Pulse%20Ox%20issues.pdf

    -------------------------------------------
    Jean Bigoney PHD
    Managing Member
    Nu Device Consulting LLC
    Newport NH
    United States



  • 16.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 20:23
    The OCH product code refers to an oximeter, infrared, sporting, aviation - Solely for use with sporting and aviation activities.Intended to monitor heart rate during exercise.
    It is a class II device, for which no submission type is specified; instead, it is under enforcement discretion.

    Considering the enforcement discretion and the number of submissions Masimo has for other, similar devices, may explain why there is no clearance mentioned.
    --


    -------------------------------------------
    Michael Zagorski
    Philips Respironics
    Monroeville PA
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 17.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 20:28
    It turns out that the Masimo's 510(k) is currently under the FDA review.

    The iSpO2™ Medical, the professional version for medical use, is pending CE Mark and U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance.

    Read more: Masimo Launches iSpO2™ -- Commercially Available Pulse Oximeter for iPhone, iPad & iPod touch - FierceMedicalDevices http://www.fiercemedicaldevices.com/press-releases/masimo-launches-ispo2-commercially-available-pulse-oximeter-iphone-ipad-ipo-0#ixzz2FdudyrWr 
    Subscribe: http://www.fiercemedicaldevices.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FierceMedicalDevices-FierceMedicalDevices



    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Regulatory Doctor, Coach, Mentor, and Consultant
    www.GlobalComplianceSeminar.Com
    Riner VA
    United States
    -------------------------------------------------------------------








  • 18.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 19-Dec-2012 07:14
    The device, where the link is made to (http://www.ispo2.com/common-uses.aspx) is also launched as a sport aid and not as a medical device. The device is not intended to be used in clinical environments and/or to treat diseases or perform diagnosis.
    This is (as far as I know) also the same with blood pressure and heart rate measurements intended for home use and/or as sports aid

    Franky





  • 19.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 19-Dec-2012 11:25
    The answer to both your questions is No! The pulse oxymeter (falls under other conditions, see definition below) is measuring a oxygen levels which makes it a medical diagnostic as per the definition if a device "an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including a component part, or accessory which is: recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them, intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve any of it's primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its primary intended purposes." Changing its intended use from from medical to recreational use is similar to saying using a drug for recreational use makes It not a drug in the eyes of FDA. Thanks, Shree ------------------------------------------- Srinagesh Koushik RAC Damascus MD United States -------------------------------------------


  • 20.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 10:07
    Blood oxygen level in itself (or some other physiological parameters like hart rate) is not a condition, in my opinion. By itself, it is just a number.
    So, until you tell the user (labeling claims) what to do with this number  and what it means, I don't think a device simply displaying such a number meets the definition of the medical device.

    I did not look at Masimo's claims, so I cannot say whether their device should be medical or not.


    -------------------------------------------
    Michael Zagorski
    Philips Respironics
    Monroeville PA
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 21.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 12:27
    Hypoxia is a pathological condition in which the body is deprived of adequate oxygen supply. If something that reads out numbers isn't a medical device, then there are many diagnostic devices that wouldn't be considered medical devices. Key is in the intended use of those numbers. For example, in this case why would a person ever buy this device for the sport and high altitude use? In order to know if/when they are becoming hypoxic. For heart rate monitors, there's not really an avoidance of a medical condition that is the intended use of the devices--people are just trying to maintain the heart rate in an ideal burn zone--they aren't necessarily trying to avoid say tachycardia or bradycardia by wearing the monitors. I don't think the same is true of pulse oximeters as the common use advertised by Masimo shows--people only care that the oxygenation of their blood supply remain above a certain threshold in order to avoid the hypoxic condition and its resulting effects. Now if studies were to come out that showed that the "ideal zone" for athletic performance is at 95% blood oxygen and hypoxia is considered to start at 87-90% then I could see an argument for using pulse oximeters to maintain levels within a normal, healthy range apart from diagnosing the condition of hypoxia.

    Question, like Jean mentioned, is whether or not hypoxia can be determined to be a "condition" when it would go away based on altitude  or surrounding oxygen levels. However, just because we know what would make a condition go away and the user chose to go to high altitudes and the condition can be considered "temporary", doesn't make it not a condition. Think diabetes glucose monitors--patient can choose to eat a bunch of sugar and elevate blood sugar levels. That condition will go down if given insulin, it may be "temporary" but that blood glucose monitor is still a medical device.

    -------------------------------------------
    Justin Baker PHD
    Custom Orthopaedic Solutions
    Cleveland OH
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 22.  RE:Non-medical use of device with medical function

    Posted 20-Dec-2012 21:11
    Good points, Justin.

    Is hypoxia always a pathological condition? Not in all cases I would say. At high altitude it is a natural, and completely reversible condition. Body can actually compensate too (to a certain degree) by creating more hemoglobin, which is why many athletes actually train at high altitude.
    Similar situation with high blood glucose level. It is a natural response after eating a meal, but it can become a pathological condition when your pancreas are shot and you cannot produce enough insulin, in which case you need a medical intervention i.e. insulin injection.

    So maybe the difference between the medical and non-medical use is how do you use this information and how do you respond to the condition you're measuring i.e. is the intervention voluntary e.g. get to a lower elevation (or as in Jean's joke, "stop doing it"), or do you need a medical intervention as in the case of diabetes.

    I'm not sure if I could defend that argument in court, but I'm just throwing it out there to continue this very interesting discussion.
    This topic of where do you draw the line between medical use and general health use is currently very hot; as it is a focal point of the long awaited final version of the Mobile Medical Apps guidance document from the FDA

    -------------------------------------------
    Michael Zagorski
    Philips Respironics
    Monroeville PA
    United States
    -------------------------------------------