Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  BATCH SELECTION FOR THE BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY

    Posted 08-Sep-2019 08:45
    Dear Members,

          Can you please inform me, can we select 24 month old test sample (near to expiry sample) for the bioequivalence study.

    In none of the guideline,  i am not able to found the the selection criteria related to the age of the sample.


    ------------------------------
    MANOJ PANIGRAHI
    Mr.
    Gujarat, India Surendranagar Surandranagar
    India
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: BATCH SELECTION FOR THE BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY

    Posted 09-Sep-2019 02:28
    As the product is within the shelf life , it must meet all the predefined product specifications. The near expiry test sample (DP) should not behave differently than the fresh test sample. Yes, some parameters might go change with age but definitely it should meet the shelf life specifications of the product which is in line with compendia / ICH requirements. So , to my understanding, there is nothing wrong to select old test sample (near expiry) for bioequivalence study. 
    Thank you

    ------------------------------
    Mir Hossain PharmD
    Gulshan Model Town
    Bangladesh
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: BATCH SELECTION FOR THE BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY

    Posted 10-Sep-2019 09:56
    As Dr. Hossain has pointed out, if the product is within its shelf life then you are saying it meets all specifications and, therefore, there is no regulatory rule that says you cannot use.  In fact, you are saying this is a product you would allow on the market (within shelf life) so it should definitely be OK to use for a biostudy.  But, setting regulations aside, let's look at strategy and risk.  You don't say whether this "sample" you intend to test in a biostudy, is an approved formulation/marketed product, or one in development that simply has met specs you have thus far set for shelf life.  For example, if this is a generic formulation not yet approved for which you intend to file and ANDA, and specs not yet approved, you have a risk that FDA might not agree with your specs upon review in the ANDA and, therefore, decide the product actually did not meet shelf life and that your biostudy is unacceptable.  Also, while one should never be afraid to test their own product (!!!!), most firms would weigh the timing and cost of making a new batch of sample versus the timing and cost of having to repeat a biostudy if the biostudy failed all because the test product was "on the edge."

    ------------------------------
    Christopher Smith, CQE, RAC
    Coastal Pharmaceutical Consultants, Inc.
    7950 Old River Road
    Burgaw, NC 28425, USA
    910.259.8877 (land)
    910.789.1232 (mobile)
    chrissmith@coastalpharmaconsultants.com
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: BATCH SELECTION FOR THE BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY

    Posted 21-Sep-2019 02:44
    Dear Mr. Christopher,

         Thanks a lot for your valuable suggestion.

    ------------------------------
    MANOJ PANIGRAHI
    Mr.
    Gujarat, India Surendranagar Surandranagar
    India
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: BATCH SELECTION FOR THE BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY

    Posted 21-Sep-2019 02:42
    Dear Dr. Hossain,

         Thanks a lot for your valuable suggestion.

    ------------------------------
    MANOJ PANIGRAHI
    Mr.
    Gujarat, India Surendranagar Surandranagar
    India
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: BATCH SELECTION FOR THE BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY

    Posted 09-Sep-2019 03:09
    Hi Manoj,
    In principle no problem with that but key is that the batch passes specification, is fully representative of routine production and is a "good/clean batch" from an assay, dissolution and batch manufacturing record perspective.
    One potential issue you may have is that if the product is not stable after 24 months and quality starts to drop off then you may have problems if you ever need to assess retained samples for any reason e.g. to support global submission review process questions.
    Remember to perform n=12 tablets/capsules for dissolution profile assessment.  Also ensure assay of test and reference product are close to each other with no more than 5% difference between the 2 assay values.
    So my overall recommendation would be not to use an aged batch if at all possible.

    ------------------------------
    Kind regards,
    Roy Jamieson (BPharm Hons, GPhC, MTOPRA, MAPS, RAPS)

    Regulatory CMC Consultant
    Jamieson Combinations AB

    E: roy.jamieson@btinternet.com
    T: +46 (0)708467411
    Skype: roy.jamieson
    www.linkedin.com/in/roy-jamieson-62019821
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: BATCH SELECTION FOR THE BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY

    Posted 21-Sep-2019 02:45
    Dear Mr. Jamieson,

         Thanks a lot for your valuable suggestion.

    ------------------------------
    MANOJ PANIGRAHI
    Mr.
    Gujarat, India Surendranagar Surandranagar
    India
    ------------------------------