Regulatory Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Letter of Appointment PRRC Art. 15 MDR

    Posted 26-Nov-2020 08:35
    Dear all,

    I am trying to create a letter of appointment for our coming persons resposible for regulatory compliance.
    We will appoint several people for the different tasks.
    Now I am pondering over the details...
    1. How do I have to handle the deputies?
      1. Do they have to be officially appointed (EUDAMED and/or internal letter of appointment) as well, or is being deputy a kind of delegation of duties?
      2. How needs a deputy to sign ("by order of prrc" or "on behalf of prrc" or  without any kind of disclaimer)?
    2. Do I need some kind of declaration of consent of the persons in question before I submit their names to EUDAMED (--> data privacy)? Should this be part of the letter of appointment?
    3. How do I handle questions regarding liabity? Does the "directors and officers liability Insurance" need to include the names of the prrc's or the position of prrc as appointed?
    4. When we have several PRRC, may they sign as PRRC or do they need to be exact (e.g. PRRC Vigilance)?
    5. and, last question: has anyone a template, which she/he might like to share?

    Thank you for your help!

    KR Britta

    ------------------------------
    Britta Cyron
    Bochum
    Germany
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Letter of Appointment PRRC Art. 15 MDR

    Posted 27-Nov-2020 08:29

    Don't have deputies. A person is either a PRRC or not. You can have more than one PRRC. If you do then "their respective areas of responsibility shall be stipulated in writing". I recommend that you give each person every area of responsibility. That gives you flexibility.

    The appointment letter should come from top management as defined in ISO 13485:2016 which incorporates the definition in ISO 9000:2015.

    It should say, "I appoint the following people as a Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance under the EU-MDR Article 15. Each person has responsibility related to Art. 15(3)." <List of Names>

    Under the assumption your QMS implements 21 CFR Part 820, put the appointment letter in the Quality System Record, 820.186. ISO 13485:2016 doesn't have a similar place.

    The PRRC doesn't have to sign anything. The role is to assure that certain things happen, not to do them. If your company has an approach to "official" acts performed by the Management Representative, then use that as model.

    I don't think there is a privacy issue in Eudamed because you are not providing personal information. This is company information.



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Letter of Appointment PRRC Art. 15 MDR

    Posted 28-Nov-2020 10:42

    Another point occurred to me.

    You will not have any process changes as a result of appointing a PRRC. For each area of responsibility, you currently have somebody who does it and somebody who ensures it is done. Those processes should not change.

    While there are many ways for the PRRC to exercise the responsibility to ensure, I think the best method uses the internal quality audit program. The PRRC should ensure the audit program has the proper scope, frequency, and coverage in each area. Also, consider making the PRRC an internal quality auditor.



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Letter of Appointment PRRC Art. 15 MDR

    Posted 01-Dec-2020 02:46
    Dan,

    Thank you foor your insights. Your point of view diverts from everything I learned so far regarding PRRC. For example

    "I recommend that you give each person every area of responsibility."
    In our company people are quite highly specialized. Someone responsible for post market surveillance does not neccessarily need to know much (or even anything) about device conformity checking. And everybody else told me that in such a case you really should appoint a PRRC for each area of expertise. I have already seen signatures from other companies with "PRRC PMS and Vigilance".

    And I would expect that a PRRC should sign stuff as part of the job. For example EU Declaration of Conformity, proof of compliance with general safety and performance, PMS plans, Vigilance reporting...

    And for deputies:
    I will give you an example of what I have in mind:  At the moment signs our QMR declarations of conformity. In his absence do I sign them as one of his deputies. I do not have a letter of appointment, but I am named as deputy in our company organisation chart, so that I am authorized. To date, this approach is approved by our notified body (we do not operate in the US, so no FDA QMS). To our understanding, the PRRC should sign the DoC under MDR. Our QMR will be PRRC for device conformity and technical documentation. What will I be when I still have to sign a DoC in his absence? Do I have to be named as PRRC in EUDAMED or can I still be a deputy in our company organisation chart?

    I am sorry, if I might sound confused. On the one hand I am, but on the other hand I am not a native speaker and describing legal issues in English is not part of my usual vocabulary. So please bear with me.

    ------------------------------
    Britta Cyron
    Bochum
    Germany
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Letter of Appointment PRRC Art. 15 MDR

    Posted 02-Dec-2020 09:24

    My sense is to keep things simple. Name the people and give them all responsibilities.

    If you choose to divide the responsibilities, then put in a table with the name in one column and that person's responsibilities in another. Article 15(3) has five areas, so be sure to have at least two people for each area. That solves the problem of deputies.

    There is no requirement for the PRRC to sign anything. You already have the responsibility assigned, you QMR signs the DoC as the QMR. There is no reason to change it.

    If you decide to change so a PRRC must sign the DoC, for example, then the deputy must also be a PRRC.

    My recommendation is to keep the PRRC in the "responsible for ensuring that" role and not in the "performing" role.



    ------------------------------
    Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE
    Swanzey NH
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Letter of Appointment PRRC Art. 15 MDR

    Posted 29-Nov-2020 13:12
    Chances are that your company has already appointed a Data Protection Office (DPO) under the GDPR, which is a great model for the PRRC appointment. You can use the template of your privacy colleagues with a few tweaks explained in this presentation of mine: https://www.slideshare.net/ErikVollebregt/q1-mdr-and-ivdr-prrc-presentation

    Best regards,
    Erik

    ------------------------------
    Erik Vollebregt
    Partner
    Amsterdam
    Netherlands
    ------------------------------