It has been my training from FDA regulatory counsel and my actual affidavit-related experience over the years that the firm should in fact leave the room without acknowledging the existence of the affidavit. I've been instructed by FDA counsel, and have in real life practiced, to politely decline to read an affidavit, decline to hear an affidavit being read out loud, and certainly decline to sign an affidavit. My understanding is that, as a
general rule (exceptions may exist), there is virtually no benefit to a firm or individual for cooperating with an affidavit. A fundamental purpose of an affidavit is to get a recipient to admit guilt, fault, wrong-doing, etc., and/or to admit facts that establish such violations/incriminations. The affidavits are written by an FDA law enforcement officer and/or FDA counsel, yet in the first person as if the recipient themselves made the statements in the affidavit. Then the recipient is asked to sign the statement. It's definitely a bit creepy when an FDA investigator attempts to assert an affidavit.
------------------------------
Kevin Randall, ASQ CQA, RAC (U.S., Europe, Canada)
Principal Consultant
Ridgway, CO
United States
© Copyright 2023 by ComplianceAcuity, Inc. All rights reserved.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 30-Jan-2023 14:00
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: FDA Inspections and Request to sign affidavit
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hello!
I am new to the FDA inspection process.
I noticed in the corporate policy there is a reference instructing employees what to do when requested by FDA Inspectors to sign an affidavit.
I assume this is based on the experience of such cases.
Can you please explain in what cases this could happen? Why would an inspector ask for an affidavit?
What is your experience with inspections and similar requests?