Anon,
I think you might find some regulatory reviewers unfortunately would not draw a clear distinction between symbols and icons which may be used within a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). Indeed the symbols from ISO 15233-1 are quite clear or identified in the standard. If the product uses specific icons to indicate errors or other informative notes for the user, at a minimum there would be a glossary of these icons (symbols) in your Instructions for Use (IFU). This then leads into other areas such as Usability and Risk where the icon should be assessed from a user perspective if readily understood or if there should be additional indicators or notes when an icon might not be recognisable. Much of this depends on the SaMD, how it is used, what it is used for, and definitely the type of icons used. Where do you draw the line? You draw the line. Meaning, within your own internal technical documentation, you identify what are symbols and what are icons. However, I would use caution on reducing control of icons, because from a usability and risk perspective (depending on the device) a regulatory reviewer again might not make a demarcation between the two.
------------------------------
Richard Vincins ASQ-CQA, MTOPRA, RAC
Vice President Global Regulatory Affairs
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 16-Nov-2022 22:00
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: SaMD - Symbols for Labelling vs Icons
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hi,
I have a question about where to draw the line between symbols and icons used within SaMD (web based).
The symbols for ISO 15223-1 are used in the SaMD; however, we do use other icons to indicate errors and informative notes within the software. Would these be considered custom symbols and therefore need validating per ISO 15223-2?
Where do we draw the line between what is a symbol and what is an icon? This way, we can reduce the control we need to have on icons from a labelling perspective.
Thanks!