Profile

Michael Hottner

Contact Details

Germany

Contributions

1 to 5 of 38 total
Posted By Michael Hottner 05-Dec-2023 10:37
Found In Egroup: Regulatory Open Forum
\ view thread
Hello, Sadly not so difficult to find some very recent examples: https://journal.emwa.org/medical-devices-2017/french-breast-implants-the-medical-device-regulation-and-a-theoretical-case-study/article/3087/emwa-26-2-frumento-2.pdf https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/upda ...
Posted By Michael Hottner 05-Dec-2023 05:29
Found In Egroup: Regulatory Open Forum
\ view thread
Hello Community, We currently plan bicomp. testing for an upcoming 510(k) submission. According to a device specific standard Leachables testing is expected, e.g. according to ISO 10993-18, and full E&L testing is part of our biocomp. strategy anyway. In a recent 510(k) for a different device ...
Posted By Michael Hottner 14-Jul-2023 16:54
Found In Egroup: Regulatory Open Forum
\ view thread
Hi, I agree with the TRT based on the upper limit. It is even part of some notified body checklists to proove that the calculation of accelerated aging time is based on the delta between accelerated aging temperature and TRT. However, I am not aware about a standard or formula to conduct this calculation ...
Posted By Michael Hottner 02-May-2023 15:08
Found In Egroup: Regulatory Open Forum
\ view thread
You could reach out to Dennis Brussies from Brussies Life Sciences: http://brussies-ls.com/ ------------------------------ Michael Hottner Köln Germany ------------------------------
Posted By Michael Hottner 16-Nov-2022 16:10
Found In Egroup: Regulatory Open Forum
\ view thread
Great discussion! I personally have a really strong opinion here: The scope section of ISO 10993-1  clearly defines that the standard applies only to devices with - patient contact during intended use - user's body only if the device is intended for protection. So I would always try to argue that any ...